Hillary Clinton broke through the “glass ceiling” by being the first ever rape apologist nominated by a major political party. Feminists who claim to “love women” take note. Juanita Broadderick has already spoken out against Madam Pantsuit. Now another rape victim, Kathy Shelton, spoke to The Daily Mail about the woman who defended Kathy’s rapist…who raped her when she was 12 years old: https://www.louderwithcrowder.com/child-rape-victim-hillary-clinton-is-a-liar/


Bob Whitaker is quoted, “We have a fake president because we haven’t woken up Whites to their genocide so that they demand a real president.” When a people’s entire political machinery ignores that people’s genocide, that machinery and its politicians exist in unreality. The president who heads the machinery must function within its anti-White parameters or at least appear to. So however much we may appreciate some things that Trump is doing, we should be clear-headed about the limitations of what he will do. But: he could use his skill to start reorienting that machinery against White Genocide if he wishes. We should encourage that, while of course continuing to fight White Genocide by hammering the same few simple memes relentlessly into White minds and into public discourse. More here: http://www.fightwhitegenocide.com/2017/03/18/a-fake-polity-requires-a-fake-president/


To say 57 countries practicing this BARBARISM are radicals or only a few extremist “bad apples” distorting the real Jesus-like-Islam IS STUPID AND DANGEROUS and it’s getting people killed. Stop saying it and help www.BanIslamNOW.com

The ONLY (Actually, it’s not the only reason!) reason the deceptive term “Radical Islam” is deployed is to avoid the maniacal retaliatory wrath of Liberals & “peaceful” Muslims.

There is no such thing as RADICAL ISLAM. Islam mandates the murder of anyone who leaves Islam (it’s called DEATH FOR APOSTASY). Islam also summarily executes atheists, polytheists, gays, blasphemers, adulterers, Hindus, Jews, critics and dissidents. Islam encourages Muslims to rape infidel women as Mohammad did. That’s why SWEDEN IS NOW THE RAPE CAPITAL OF THE WORLD.

This misogyny and violence is MAINSTREAM Islam and SHARIA and it’s practiced in FIFTY SEVEN ISLAMIC COUNTRIES. These are not extremists - these are GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS who happen to be Muslim and run 57 countries. They are close to taking over the entire Middle East, Africa and Europe.


If I was to state all Muslims are the vilest of animals, would you class this as hate speech? Many would.

But can I draw the readers attention to the 8th sura ayat 55? This verse states that all non believers are the vilest of animals.

Surely to define hate speech you can not be bias towards the author. It has to work both ways.

If I was write a book stating in over 100 verses to kill all non-Muslims, you would think I would be arrested and thrown into prison... but no one needs to write such a book… such a book already exists and is considered a holy book by Muslims and what would have to be, ignorant non-Muslims.

Not only are we so tolerant that we would consider building a mosque on ground zero, but we are also forbidden to criticise a religion that teaches its followers to kill and harm us. These verses from the Quran don’t just stop at killing either, they are taught to torture us in ways such as cutting off finger tips (8:12)

The Quran even states that a non believer has three choices, one, die. Two, become Muslim. Or three, pay a forced tax to all Muslims (jizya) (9:29)

So to define ‘hate speech’ you must look to whence this ‘hate speech’ is coming from. Is it ‘hate speech’ to have the desire to protect yourself from a force, being or religion that openly wants you dead? http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/pages/articles/quran-hate.aspx


George writes, “I admire Muslim women and all women who practice the virtue of modesty, whether they choose to cover their hair or not. There are many ways to honour modesty and practices vary culturally in perfectly legitimate ways.”

Unfortunately he is operating under a misapprehension. The Hijab and the Burka and variations of mandatory female coverings have nothing to do with modesty.

The Koranic verse that mandates covering states, “O Prophet! Tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to draw their cloaks all over their bodies that they may thus be distinguished and not molested” (Koran 33:59)

That’s not modesty. The covering is being worn to avoid rape.

The key words here are “distinguished and not molested”. Whom are these women being distinguished from? Women who don’t cover up and can be molested. One Koranic commentator explicitly makes that very point as I discuss in Muslim Rape Culture.

This isn’t modesty. It’s repression and fear. As Robert Spencer points out, the Hijab is accompanied by repression.

Aqsa Parvez’s Muslim father choked her to death with her hijab after she refused to wear it. Amina Muse Ali was a Christian woman in Somalia whom Muslims murdered because she wasn’t wearing a hijab. Forty women were murdered in Iraq in 2007 for not wearing the hijab.

There’s an endless list of similar cases. Robert P. George might want to examine the religious freedom he is really defending.

A survey conducted in France in May 2003 found that 77 percent of girls wearing the hijab said they did so because of physical threats from Islamist groups.

We can’t dismiss a number that large as the work of a handful of extremists. And this isn’t taking place in some Third World country. It’s happening in France.

More often the girls were under orders from their fathers and uncles and brothers, and even their male classmates. For the boys, transforming a bluejeaned teen-age sister into a docile and observant “Muslim” virgin was a rite de passage into authority, the fast track to becoming a man, and more important, a Muslim man…. it was also a license for violence.

Girls who did not conform were excoriated, or chased, or beaten by fanatical young men meting out “Islamic justice.” Sometimes the girls were gang-raped. In 2002, an unveiled Muslim girl in the cite of Vitry-sur-Seine was burned alive by a boy she turned down.

This isn’t modesty.

The Hijab and the Burka are not voluntary and they have nothing to do with modesty. The various Islamic coverings are motivated by fear, shame and abuse. http://www.frontpagemag.com/point/218135/hijab-has-nothing-do-modesty-daniel-greenfield


Brigitte Bardot expressed in the article named, Open Letter to My Lost France: “...my country, France, my homeland, my land is again invaded by an overpopulation of foreigners, especially Muslims.”In her 2003 book, A Scream in the Silence, she warned of the “Islamicisation of France”, and said of Muslim immigration: “Over the last twenty years, we have given in to a subterranean, dangerous, and uncontrolled infiltration, which not only resists adjusting to our laws and customs but which will, as the years pass, attempt to impose its own.” She was fined €5,000 (then worth £2,900).

Related articles: http://www.barenakedislam.com/2014/04/10/france-18-year-old-girl-raped-by-4-muslim-minors-because-she-is-french-and-the-french-are-all-sons-of-whores/ 


Recent immigrants from certain repressive cultures have sometimes brought with them a number of unwelcome traditions from home, such as honour killings. These types of problems tend mainly to target women within the immigrant communities, although this does not make them any less regrettable. Yet there are plenty of problems and imported multicultural tensions that cause suffering among the native population, too.

It’s not entirely coincidental that the first essay I wrote under the pseudonym Fjordman was about rape in Sweden. In no case is there a worse discrepancy between how Sweden likes to present itself to the world and how the country actually is than when it comes to the question of rape. Its carefully cultivated image as a champion of women’s rights runs counter to the real-life fact that Sweden is becoming a hell for many women.

I no longer write about this subject as often as I once did for the simple reason that I’m tired of it. It’s for the same reason that I sometimes write about science and astronomy whenever I’m fed up with Islam: you get tired of digging into darkness sometimes. Sadly, darkness doesn’t always go away just because you don’t want to talk about it.

The problem of rapes in Sweden is worse now than when I first wrote about it almost a decade ago. The 6,320 reported rapes officially registered in that country in 2012 almost certainly do not represent the full number of such crimes that actually took place that year. In 2,880 of these registered rapes, the victims were minors and children aged between 0-17 years old. A surprising 10% of these victims of child rape in Sweden in 2012 were boys. The male percentage of rape victims is smaller for adults, but still higher than it used to be some time ago.

We know that many rape victims do not report the crime, perhaps partly due to shame and fear. If we assume that 25% of the rapes that are committed are reported to the police authorities, the total number of rapes in Sweden in 2012 would actually be over 25,000 rather than 6,320, which was already bad enough. If we assume that just 10% of the committed rapes are actually reported and recorded, an estimate which some researchers operate with, the number of rapes in Sweden in 2012 alone would be a staggering 63,200.

If we use the lower of these two estimates, that amounts to roughly one hundred thousand rape victims in Sweden in just four years. If we use the higher – but still not totally unrealistic – estimate, that would make a quarter of a million Swedish rape victims within a four-year period, and one million in about sixteen years.

By any estimate, we are in all likelihood dealing with hundreds of thousands of rapes per generation, perhaps between half a million and one million. That’s an incredibly large number for a country with just over nine million inhabitants. It resembles war. Tens of thousands of these victims are children.

It is known that some particularly vulnerable victims are raped more than once. We should also recall that of the roughly 4.5 million females in Sweden, some are quite old and therefore statistically unlikely to be targeted by rape. This makes the percentage of young Swedish women being raped all the worse.

A report from 2011 showed a shocking rise in the number of consummated rapes against children under the age of 15. The number rose from a little over 200 in 1995 to about 1,400 in 2008. The curve was then still rising. It is conceivable that some of this could be related to a change in the legal definition of rape, but the increase is so staggering that is highly likely to reflect a very real increase in the number of rapes in Swedish society.

The Danish author Morten Uhrskov Jensen looked into the official numbers and found that in the first seven months of 2013, Stockholm County alone registered 300 – three hundred – reported rapes of minors under the age of 15. That’s more than 500 a year, if the trend continues. This figure was for a single region only, not for the entire country.

Minors under the age of 15 are children by virtually any definition. Moreover, as mentioned previously we always have to take into account that not all such cases are reported. We are thus dealing with in all probability thousands of child rapes annually in Sweden, and by extension tens of thousands per decade.

As Morten Uhrskov Jensen stated, these figures are nothing less than horrific for what used to be a peaceful Scandinavian country. These victims are not just faceless numbers in a statistic; they are very real human beings. Many of them have their lives destroyed. In some cases, the victims have become so traumatized that they’ve taken their own lives. The families of the victims will also be affected by the trauma of such crimes.

One should keep in mind here that this comes on top of various types of sexual harassment and abuse that are not technically classified as rape. Besides, we have countless other cases of non-sexual abuse, assault, robberies, harassment and violence targeting people of both sexes on a regular basis. In combination, this generates an atmosphere of violence and fear.

There were rapes in this region before non-European mass immigration, of course, but not nearly as many as now. In addition to sheer numbers, the brutality has gotten worse, sometimes involving sadistic torture. Gang rapes used to be exceedingly rare in Scandinavia, but sadly, this is no longer the case. As we have just seen above, the number of rapes involving minors and children has also shown a shocking increase.

Rape of men, too, used to be uncommon in this part of the world. Not anymore. A 17-year-old boy reported being gang raped by several men in the town of Växjö in southern Sweden. In 2012, 132 men in Sweden reported being raped. Once more, we have to assume that quite a few people don’t file a report at all. The humiliation, shame and stigma attached to being a male rape victim are presumably at least as strong as for female victims.

The Swedish mass media and political elites are very careful not to suggest any connection between these rapes and mass immigration from Third World countries. Yet there is every reason to suspect that such a connection exists. We know from other Western European countries that immigrants from certain regions and cultures, particularly from the Islamic world and Africa, are disproportionately represented as perpetrators in rape cases.

In Britain, especially in English cities, a disturbing number of cases have been revealed in which Muslim men prey on girls, some of them as young as ten years old, drug them and sexually abuse them. Most of their young victims are native white girls, but occasionally they will even prey on non-Muslim girls from other immigrant communities. British authorities have been shamefully slow and hesitant in dealing with these widespread child rapes. Yet at the very least, some British newspapers and magazines will occasionally write about this subject in plain words. In Sweden, the media systematically sweep the ethnic identity of such criminals under the rug. 

Eva Agnete Selsing wonders how the “hypocritical” Swedish political and media elites can sleep at night, knowing fully well what kind of nightmare of violence and street crime they are pushing on their own people. Her conclusion is that “If your actions lead to violence, abuse, threats, repression and social control of your fellow citizens (who have never sought the reality that you have put them in), and you refuse to relate to this, then you are an evil person. And the evil empire consists of human beings.”

Perhaps Swedish authorities should worry more about the incredibly large number of rapes in their own country, and less about transsexuals in Serbia or gay adoption rights in Russia. More here: https://themuslimissue.wordpress.com/2014/02/06/swedens-muslim-rape-epidemic-a-new-hell-for-women/

WATCH, London: “This is our country, get out of our country!” says Muslim mob to a White guy, VIDEO HERE: http://whitegenocideproject.com/london-this-is-our-country-get-out-of-our-country-says-muslim-mob-to-white-guy/

Our own leaders think that it’s a great idea to get rid of all the White areas on the planet. They call this agenda “diversity”.

Africa still gets to remain Black. Asia still gets to remain Asian.

“Diversity” is a one-way street – it’s only about getting rid of White areas and White people.

It’s not “diversity” it’s White genocide.

PROOF: MUSLIMS CELEBRATED TERROR ATTACK IN LONDON: https://www.infowars.com/proof-muslims-celebrated-terror-attack-in-london/


With each passing day, the insidious evil of Google and Facebook becomes increasingly apparent to all aware individuals. The latest disgusting examples show how Google earns sick profits off content that teaches Jihadi terrorists how to commit mass murder using vehicles as weapons. Similarly, Facebook now gives “thumbs up” approval to posts that call for people to “kill white women” while simultaneously banning accounts that post Bible passages.

How sick and evil have these tech giants really become? By some accounts, they now pose an imminent threat to not just the sanity — but even the safety — of citizens everywhere.

In the hours after the London attack, the Daily Mail found vile Islamic State terror manuals online through simple searches on Google and Twitter. One included a section on using vehicles as weapons.

The vile manuals were online despite widespread warnings that jihadists use them for training.

Fanatics are urged to deploy large vehicles as ‘tools of war’ before going on a stabbing rampage – the template for Wednesday’s atrocity in Westminster.

It told jihadists in the West to learn from Palestinian terrorists who ‘have resorted to using cars as tools of war, also knives as weapons which are easily available from DIY stores’. The manual was published a year ago, before the vehicle attacks in Nice, Berlin and London, which have killed 102 people and injured more than 500. 

Another Islamic State publication was available through Google and Twitter with detailed instructions on how to cause mayhem.

In other words, anyone looking to learn how to commit murder and terrorism can go straight to Google to find out how it’s done. And during all searches, Google is making money off the search history data collection of the user as well as any possible ads that might appear, served up by Google Adwords.

At the same time Google is profiting off Jihadi terrorism manuals that promote the mass slaughter of innocents, Facebook is giving a “thumbs up” rating to a post that urges the mass killing of white women.

The way in which Facebook polices content on its network is under scrutiny again after it was revealed that a post in which a user called for white women to be “hunted and killed” was deemed to not be a violation of community standards. MORE here: http://www.naturalnews.com/2017-03-24-google-profits-from-jihadi-training-videos-that-teach-mass-murder-while-facebook-gives-thumbs-up-to-kill-white-women-posts.html


Sometimes it appears that communities are en masse engaged in strategic anti-Western practices. This begins to verge on the level of conspiracy-theory, but nonetheless there is governmental evidence to back it up. It is best that Bruce Bawer speaks for himself:

“Kheir Sajer, an Oslo Muslim who describes Islamism as a ‘cancer’ in his community, tells of an Oslo imam who has preached that Christians, under sharia law, must pay jizra, the protection tax demanded of all infidels living in Muslim lands: ‘In Norway, they don’t do this. Therefore the Muslims have a right to steal from them. If a Muslim walks straight into a store and steals, it is thus a legitimate act.’ Other Oslo imams, says Sajer, agree. [...]

Many immigrants have been extremely successful at exploiting the generosity of Western welfare states [...] In Norway, the handouts come in a wide variety of forms - among them public assistance, unemployment benefits, relief payments, child benefits, disability, cash support, and rent allowance. One reason the Scandinavian welfare system has worked as well as it has is that most Scandinavians have been pretty good about not taking excessive advantage of it. [...] To a surprising extent, much of the social security apparatus functions on a sort of honour system: unless you require it, you don’t ask for it.

“After the 2005 terrorist attacks on London, it emerged that the four suspects had raked in more than half a million pounds in welfare benefits from the British government.”

Alas, this is a different kind of honor than many immigrants are familiar with. Most come from poor villages in undeveloped countries with high levels of corruption - a background that tends to breed cynicism, duplicity, and an exceptional skill at manipulating the system. For people with such backgrounds, the goal is to grab everything one can get; only a fool would not take maximum advantage of the kind of bounty that Western Europe offers. Besides, many of them are told by their religious leaders that Muslim law gives them the right to abuse the infidels’ system as much as possible - the right, in Kheir Sajer’s words, to ‘cheat and lie to the countries that harbour them.’ They are told to view the benefits they receive as jizya. [...] In Denmark, Muslims make up 5 percent of the population but receive 40 percent of welfare outlays.”

Some state investigations have found large-scale and significant abuses of the system by entire extended families and portions of Muslim communities. Such immigrants often claim on behalf of family and relatives that are actually living in, say, Morocco, and who routinely lie about how many dependents they have.

The idea that Islam is a “peaceful religion hijacked by extremists” is a dangerous fantasy—and it is now a particularly dangerous fantasy for Muslims to indulge. It is not at all clear how we should proceed in our dialogue with the Muslim world, but deluding ourselves with euphemisms is not the answer. It now appears to be a truism in foreign policy circles that real reform in the Muslim world cannot be imposed from the outside. But it is important to recognize why this is so—it is so because the Muslim world is utterly deranged by its religious tribalism. In confronting the religious literalism and ignorance of the Muslim world, we must appreciate how terrifyingly isolated Muslims have become in intellectual terms. The problem is especially acute in the Arab world. Consider: Arabs represent 5% of the world’s population and yet produce only 1% of the world’s books, most of them religious. In fact, Spain translates more books into Spanish each year than the entire Arab world has translated into Arabic since the ninth century. - Sam Harris

Although Muslims often tell critics of Islam to “read the Quran,” they are usually unprepared for what happens when their advice is heeded. 

An honest translation of Islam’s holiest book generally reinforces negative opinion. The fallback is to then claim that the Quran can only be understood in Arabic.

Of all the efforts to artificially insulate Islam from intellectual critique, this is probably the most transparent. Unfortunately, for those Muslims craving reassurance from the more embarrassing passages of the Quran and Sunnah, this cheap tactic of arbitrarily dismissing anything they disagree with still comes at a heavy price, since Islam cannot be protected in this way without sacrificing its claim to being a universal religion.

In the first place, it is fundamentally impossible for anyone to learn a language that cannot be translated into the only one they do know, which means the apologists who insist that one “must learn Arabic” in order to understand the Quran are committing a logical fallacy. Either the Arabic of the Quran is translatable (in which case there is no need to learn Arabic) or it is not (in which case it can never be learned by the non-native speaker).

Enter the skeptic. While every language has its nuances, how is that Arabic is the only one with words and phrases that are literally untranslatable?More importantly, why in the world would Allah choose to communicate his one true religion for all people in the only language that cannot be understood by all people? Even the vast majority of Muslims and their imams do not speak Arabic.

Even more suspicious is that this amazing linguistic “discovery” was only recently made – and that it corresponds quite remarkably with the contemporary rejection of Islamic practices that were considered acceptable up until the religion’s recent collision with Western liberalism. In fact, the argument that hidden and alternate meanings exist to unflattering Quranic passages (justifying slavery, the inferior status of women, sexual gluttony, holy warfare, wife-beating, and religious discrimination) perfectly corresponds with the level of embarrassment that modern scholars have about the presence of such verses in the Quran!

No other world religion claims that knowledge of a particular language is imperative to understanding itself and its holy texts. Neither is the same level of effort required to massage a primary message into palatability. While the Bible is distributed pretty much as is by various Christian groups, for example, it is rare to find a Quran that does not include voluminous and highly subjective footnoted commentary deemed necessary to explain away the straightforward interpretation of politically-incorrect passages.

An additional problem for the apologists is that they want to have it both ways. On the one hand they declare that (for some strange reason) the “perfect book” can’t be translated and that Allah’s perfect religion thus cannot be understood by most of humanity without a battery of intercessors and interpreters. Then they turn around and blame the reality of Islamic terrorism on this same “necessary” chain of intermediaries by claiming that the Osama bin Ladens of the world have simply gotten bad clerical advice, causing them to “misunderstand” the true meaning of the Religion of Peace (in the most catastrophic and tragic way imaginable).

Of course, another irony here is that, as a Saudi, the Quran-toting Osama bin Laden was a native Arabic speaker – as are most of the leaders and foot soldiers in his al-Qaeda brotherhood of devout Muslims. In fact, many critics of Islam are Arabic speakers as well - a fact that is often ignored by the apologists, who only find Arabic linguistic skills relevant when they are lacking (not that the same pundits have ever been known to care about whether a critic of the Bible speaks Hebrew or Greek).

At this point there is only one avenue of escape for the beleaguered apologist - the weak claim that the Qur’an can only be understood in Classical Arabic, an obscure Quraish dialect which has not been commonly used in over a thousand years and is only known by a few hundred people alive today (generally Wahabbi scholars, who are - ironically enough - accused of taking the Qur’an ‘too literally’).

It is hardly plausible that the differences between classical and modern Arabic are of such significance that peace and tolerance can be confused with terrorism, but even if this were true, it merely begs the question all the more. Why would such a “perfect book” be virtually impossible for the rest of us to learn - and susceptible to such horrible “misinterpretation” on an on-going basis?

Really, it isn’t hard to see through this childish game, particularly since the rules are applied only to detractors and not to advocates. Apologists never claim that Arabic is a barrier to understanding Islam when it comes to lauding the religion, no matter how less knowledgeable those offering praise are than the critics. Neither do they qualify the claim that “Islam is the fastest growing religion” with the caveat that new converts (or the vast majority of existing Muslims) don’t understand Islam since they can’t read the Quran in Arabic.

Obviously, the real reason for this illogical myth is that the information age is now making the full history and texts of the Islamic religion available to a broader audience, and the contents are highly embarrassing to both Muslim scholars and their faithful flock. 

Pretending that different meanings exist in Arabic is means of self-assurance and saving face with others. thereligionofpeace.com


Let me remind you that parts of Hebrew Bible—books like Leviticus and Exodus and Deuteronomy—are the most repellent, the most sickeningly unethical documents to be found in any religion. They’re worse than the Koran. They’re worse than any part of the New Testament. There are religious extremists among Jews. Now, I consider these people to be truly dangerous, and their religious beliefs are as divisive and as unwarranted as the beliefs of devout Muslims: https://www.samharris.org/podcast/item/why-dont-i-criticize-israel

Jews Posing As “Neo-Nazis”

Some choice examples of “Kosher Nazis”:

• 1946 to 1979: The Animist Party and National Renaissance Party (NRP), early U.S. “neo-Nazi groups,” are organized under titular leader James Madole, actually a cat’s-paw of the Anti-Defamation League. Former Bolshevik spy Vladimir Stepankowsky, Emanuel Trujillo (alias ‘Mana Truhill’), and other Jewish and/or Communist agents of the ADL are Madole’s main source of financial support and organizational talent from the beginning. During the 1950s the NRP emerges as the most sensational and visible American “neo-Nazi group,” with its brown-shirted swastika-banded “stormtroopers” frequently staging street demonstrations in New York City that often and predictably deteriorate into riots. All related expenses, including the uniforms, are defrayed by the NRP’s main benefactor, the ADL. The swastika is displayed at ADL spy Truhill’s insistence. As “liaison officer” and de facto leader of the NRP by 1954, Truhill is in constant contact with other right-wing groups and individuals all over the world. His real work is name-gathering these people and incriminating them by coaxing extreme anti-Semitic remarks from them, thus collecting juicy tidbits for the ADL’s vast library of dossiers. (Joseph P. Kamp, The Bigots Behind the Swastika Spree (New York: Headlines, 1960))

• 1950s & ’60s: The foreign intelligence division of Stasi, Communist East Germany’s secret police apparatus, infiltrates spies into West Germany to pose as “neo-Nazis engaged in anti-Semitic vandalism,” a psy-ops campaign organized by Stasi spy-master Markus Wolf—a Jew. ADL director Benjamin R. Epstein follows through by traveling to Germany and advocating long-term Stalinist “re-education” for West Germans. In other words this is just the Jew World Empire performing a “pretext operation” so it can further torment people it hates (Joseph P. Kamp, The Bigots Behind the Swastika Spree (New York: Headlines, 1960); Michael Kallenbach, Stasi Files reveal links to anti-Semitic attacks in former West Germany, 12 March 1993 Jewish Chronicle (UK))

• 1965-1971: The Canadian Jewish Congress (CJC; Canada’s premier Jewish advocacy organization) decides to promote John Beattie, an insignificant fringe figure, to “public menace” status along with his ridiculous “Canadian Nazi Party,” Canada’s closest thing to the NRP. Most of Beattie’s ten “followers” are actually CJC spies / agents provocateurs. Following a curious, probably staged incident in May 1965, Beattie is suddenly “newsworthy,” his irrelevant extreme views palmed off as “news” on the front pages of most Toronto dailies. Only the “conservative” Toronto Telegram notices the weird smell and exposes the food chain behind Beattie, for example CJC operative Henrick Van Der Windt’s involvement (issue of 25 June 1965). Soon the 100-year-old newspaper is being abandoned by major advertisers and sabotaged from within by union employees, finally collapsing six years later. Thanks to a down-payment donated by Van Der Windt, ergo the CJC, Beattie is able to move his outfit into an inflammatory Toronto address.
Beattie’s circus freak act is suddenly so “important” and prominent because the CJC wants to manipulate Canadians into accepting federal laws criminalizing ‘hate speech,’ laws it’s been conniving to shove down their throats since the 1930s and is preparing via the ‘Cohen Committee’ in Ottawa, also beginning in 1965. As §319 of the Criminal Code and §13.1 of the Canadian Human Rights Act, titled “telephonic communication of hate,” these laws are signed into effect in 1971, after which the Canadian Nazi Party promptly implodes. (Patrick Walsh, The Unholy Alliance: A Documented Exposé of How Agents Provocateur Infiltrate and Misdirect, then Destroy, Well-Meaning Patriotic Groups (Flesherton, Ontario : Canadian Intelligence Publications, 1986) The John Beattie Case; Canadian Association For Free Expression, John Beattie to Expose the Nazi Party That Never Was (press release), 26 November 2000)

• June 25, 1978: Frank “Collin” the Heartless Nazi Monster leads his “Nazi march” on its alternate route through Chicago. During preceding weeks “Collin” achieved national notoriety with his outrageous original plan to march through the suburb of Skokie, the largest community of “Holocaust survivors” on earth. His “right to march” is championed by Jewish attorney and purported “civil liberties advocate” Alan Dershowitz.

“Collin’s” real family name: Cohen. He’s Jewish. His father is a “Holocaust survivor.”

His “Fuhrer” career is destroyed when this comes to light, but most Americans are none the wiser, so three years later “Frank ‘Collin’ the Nazi Monster” and his march become the subject of a nationwide made-for-television slobber-fest titled Skokie, one of many such propaganda bombs during these years. The original was NBC’s eight-hour miniseries Holocaust, a tele-orgy of fake “history” that aired two months before Collin’s march. The whole Skokie affair thus proves instrumental in catapulting Holocaust Guilt into mainstream American consciousness right when the Jewish psy-war on America is shifting gears in exactly this direction, thus Dershowitz’s real interest.

• February, 1979: Using his frequent alias of “James Guttman,” Mordecai Levy of the Jewish Defense League swaggers into the National Park Service office in Independence Hall, Philadelphia, dressed in full Nazi drag to obtain a permit for a “Nazi rally.” With permit in hand, he next contacts KKK chapters, Nazi clubs, leftist and Jewish groups, black churches, etc., alternately “inviting them to participate” / “alerting them to an outrage.” His own banner reads: “Hitler was Right! Gas the Commie Jews!” At this time Levy is an asset of the Anti-Defamation League (as revealed by ADL fact-finder Gail Gans to Village Voice reporter Robert Friedman). Reporters penetrate Levy’s sordid plans and the permit is canceled under a cloud of astonishing headlines: “Jew Applied For The Permit For Nazi Rally” (Philadelphia Journal); “Nazi Rally Rouser Really Jewish” (Philadelphia Bulletin). Had Levy’s charade not been uncovered, he might have succeeded in engineering a major race riot— but it sure would have made “Nazis” look bad! (Robert Friedman, Oy Vey, Make My Day, 8/22/1989 Village Voice, p. 15).

• December 7, 1981: Minneapolis television station WCCO airs an in-house documentary, Armies of the Right, to expose “the disturbing hidden world of paramilitary right-wing extremism in the U.S.” The program’s most virulent anti-Semitic rhetoric is uttered by one “Jimmy Anderson,” actually James R. Rosenberg, one of several ADL agents provocateurs known to have infiltrated the Queens, New York chapter of the Christian Patriot’s Defense League, expressly to agitate the group as “rabid anti-Semites.” The producers of Armies of the Right know who and what Rosenberg really is but withhold this information from their audience.

• 1990s: The Canadian Jewish Congress gets back in the act, this time using member and Canadian government (CSIS) spy Grant Bristow to infiltrate the Heritage Front, a Canadian-German advocacy group, to act as an agent provocateur urging violence against Jews. Sure enough some of Bristow’s dupes are arrested at a well-known Jewish hangout after raiding it and provoking a brawl. Totally disgraced by this moronic action, the Heritage Front rapidly disintegrates—obviously the real purpose from the beginning.

• Mid-1990s: “Davis Wolfgang Hawke,” a.k.a. “Commander Bo Decker,” etc., makes himself the new darling of the “neo-Nazi” movement by launching a tiny, flamboyant “Nazi” group, the Knights of Freedom Nationalist Party. Many parallels to the John Beattie and Frank “Collin” cases are striking, not least being the absurd amount of attention “Hawke” receives from media and law enforcement.
The name given to “Hawke” by his parents: Andrew Britt Greenbaum. Though posing as a Nazi in South Carolina, he’s really a Jew from Connecticut. As is usual with “Kosher Nazis,” Greenbaum is a comic caricature whose moronic public image is totally deliberate and cultivated. It’s stagecraft.

The above examples span 50 years, going back to immediately after the war that created their mold, and add up to an unmistakable pattern. Whenever a social phenomenon this sensational impinges so directly on Jews and their interests, we should always ask qui bono?— who really benefits? Naïve “White Nationalists” NEVER benefit. They just fall ever so neatly into their assigned stereotype of “dangerous morons,” which leaves the question open—but it has a definite answer!


This is why they DO IT. “White Power” / “neo-Nazism” is a Jewish covert operation with lots of DUMB GOY ASSHOLES on board, who really are dangerous— dangerous to themselves.

Before your parents were born, the late great United States was already a clever Jewish dictatorship under the Rothschilds and their local race-traitors, e.g. the Harrimans and Rockefellers. This imperial scheme grants real power only to those who show the Master (Lucifer and his children, a.k.a. “the Jews”) how eager they are to help out with his Big Plan. The kike monsters launched their Final Solution for America during Teddy Roosevelt’s presidency. In fact the Roosevelts were crypto-Jews. So was Woodrow Wilson. They installed TR in 1901 by blasting a bullet into McKinley using a Polish “Sirhan” prepared by Emma Goldman & Co.; 11 years later Teddy repaid them by helping to bulldoze Wilson into office over Taft. That was the coffin lid sliding home. The “U.S. government” and Constitution have been nothing but their stupid circus props ever since.

Save America from them? Hun, that was your great-grandparents’ duty. They blew it. How do you save a “melting pot,” meaning the weird goulash of crypto-Jewish latent serial killers (millions of em!), cultureless creedless each-for-himself sewer rats, self-hating liberal fuck-heads, and other motley scum, perverts, and imbeciles that America has putrefied into since 1880? When the children of Satan got hold of this place expressly to destroy it they did a bang-up job as always. They’ve been luring this garbage over here from every corner of the world ever since. Now America is dominated by mindless golems who can swagger to the other side of the planet and slaughter millions of Iraqi babies and grandmas for twenty years just because the kikes want them to, but keep imagining they’re “victims” and “heroes” the whole time. Wow, it’s as if they’re Jews themselves! They’re that arrogant and vicious. I defy you to “rescue” these miscreants. The very premise is stupid. They basically ARE Jews, even though most of them are “white,” but who cares who their ancestors were? They obviously don’t. The U.S. must be the most judaized country the “West” has ever seen: https://jewise.wordpress.com/jews-posing-as-neo-nazis/


“Judea declares War on Germany.” - Daily Express (March 24, 1934)

“Kill the Germans, wherever you find them! Every German is our moral enemy. Have no mercy on women, children, or the aged! Kill every German -- wipe them out!” - Ilya Ehrenburg, Glaser (p. 111)

“Germany is the enemy of Judaism and must be pursued with deadly hatred. The goal of Judaism of today is: a merciless campaign against all German peoples and the complete destruction of the nation. We demand a complete blockade of trade, the importation of raw materials stopped, and retaliation towards every German, woman and child.” - Jewish professor A. Kulischer (October, 1937)

“Our fight against Germany must be carried to the limit of what is possible. Israel has been attacked. Let us, therefore, defend Israel! Against the awakened Germany, we put an awakened Israel. And the world will defend us.” - Jewish author Pierre Creange in his book Epitres aux Juifs (1938)

“Germany must be turned into a waste land, as happened there during the 30-year War.” - Das Morgenthau-Tagebuch, The Morgenthau Dairy (p. 11)

“The fight against Germany has now been waged for months by every Jewish community, on every conference, in all labor unions and by every single Jew in the world. There are reasons for the assumption that our share in this fight is of general importance. We shall start a spiritual and material war of the whole world against Germany. Germany is striving to become once again a great nation, and to recover her lost territories as well as her colonies. But our Jewish interests call for the complete destruction of Germany...” - Valadimir Jabotinsky, in Mascha Rjetsch (January, 1934)

“I hope every German west of the Rhine River and wherever we attack, will be destroyed.” - R.F. Keeling

Winston Churchill:  “We will force this war upon Hitler, if he wants it or not.” - Winston Churchill (1936 broadcast)

“Germany becomes to powerful. We have to crush it.” - Winston Churchill (November 1936 to US-General Robert E. Wood)

“Germanys unforgivable crime before WW2 was its attempt to loosen its economy out of the world trade system and to build up an own exchange system from which the world-finance couldnt profit anymore. ...We butchered the wrong pig.” - Winston Churchill, The Second World War (Book by Winston Churchill, Bern, 1960) [Amazon]

“The war wasnt only about abolishing fascism, but to conquer sales markets. We could have, if we had intended so, prevented this war from breaking out without doing one shot, but we didn’t want to.” - Winston Churchill to Truman (Fultun, USA March 1946)

“Should Germany merchandise again in the next 50 years we have led this war (WW1) in vain.” - Winston Churchill in Times (1919)

“This war is an English war and its goal is the destruction of Germany.” - Winston Churchill (Autumn 1939 broadcast)

“Not the political doctrine of Hitler has hurled us into this war. The reason was the success of his increase in building a new economy. The roots of war were envy, greed and fear.” - Major General J.F.C. Fuller, historian, England

“We didn’t go to war in 1939 to save Germany from Hitler...or the continent from fascism. Like in 1914 we went to war for the not lesser noble cause that we couldnt accept a German hegemony over Europe.” - Sunday Correspondent, London (17.9.1989)

“Now we have forced Hitler to war so he no longer can peacefully annihilate one piece of the Treaty of Versailles after the other.” -Lord Halifax, English embassador in Washington (1939)

“The enemy is the German Reich and not Nazism, and those who still havent understood this, havent understood anything.” -Churchills chief counselor Robert Lord Vansittart (September 1940 to foreign minister Lord Halifax)

“It will be the Polish army that will invade Germany on the first day of war.” - The Polish embassador in Paris (15.8.1939)

“I will crunch Germany.” - Roosevelt 1932(!)

“What we didn’t want to comprehend in the German (anti-Hitler) resistance during war, we learned completely afterwards: this war wasnt led against Hitler but against Germany.” - Eugen Gerstenmaier, President of the German Bundestag since 1954, member of the resistance group “Bekennende Kirche” during WW2

“Hitler and the German people didn’t want this war. We didn’t answer Hitlers various petitions for peace. Now we have to admit that he was right. Instead of a cooperation with Germany, which he had offered us, now stands the gigantic, imperialistic might of the Sovjets. I feel ashamed to see how the same intentions which we accused Hitler of now are pursued under a different name.” -Sir Hartley Shawcross, British chief-accuser in Nuerenberg

“We made a monster, a devil out of Hitler. Therefore we couldnt disavow it after the war. After all, we mobilized the masses against the devil himself. So we were forced to play our part in this diabolic scenario after the war. In no way we could have pointed out to our people that the war only was an economic preventive measure.” - US foreign minister Baker (1992)

“Will there be room for [the German refugees, fleeing before the Red army] in what is left of Germany? We have killed six or seven million Germans and probably there will be an other million or so killed before the end of the war.” - Churchill, according to James F Byrnes’ shorthand note of Plenary Session at Yalta, Feb. 7, 1945 (H S Truman Libr., Independence, Missouri)

“I do not understand the squeamishness about the use of gas. I am strongly in favour of using poisonous gas against uncivilised tribes.” - Churchill, writing as president of the Air Council (1919)

“It is alarming and nauseating to see Mr Gandhi, a seditious Middle Temple lawyer, now posing as a fakir of a type well known in the east, striding half naked up the steps of the viceregal palace, while he is still organising and conducting a campaign of civil disobedience, to parlay on equal terms with the representative of the Emperor-King.” - Churchill, commenting on Gandhi’s meeting with the Viceroy of India (1931)

“(We must rally against) a poisoned Russia, an infected Russia of armed hordes not only smiting with bayonet and cannon, but accompanied and preceded by swarms of typhus-bearing vermin.” - Churchill, quoted in the Boston Review (April/May 2001)

“So far as Britain and Russia were concerned, how would it do for you to have 90% of Romania, for us to have 90% of the say in Greece, and go 50/50 about Yugoslavia?” - Churchill, addressing Stalin in Moscow (October 1944)

“This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States)... this worldwide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilisation and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the19 th century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire.” - Winston Churchill writing on ‘Zionism versus Bolshevism’ in the Illustrated Sunday Herald (February 1920)

“Kill, kill, you brave Red Army soldiers, kill. There is nothing in the Germans that is innocent. Obey the instructions of comrade Stalin and stamp the fascistic beast in its cave. Break with force the racial arrogance of the Germanic women. Take them as your legal loot. Kill, you brave soldiers of the Red Army, kill!” - Ilya Ehrenburg Stalin’s Jewish propagandist for genocide (Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, Frankfurt, February 28, 1995 - page 7)

“There can be no doubt: National Socialism was part of a modernisation process in German society. It expedited the social changes in Germany. It transferred more to the underprivileged segments of society and brought equality and emancipation to women.” - Heinz Hoehne, Gebt mir vier Jahre Zeit [Give me four Years], Ullstein Publishing House, Berlin-Frankfurt 1996, p. 10)

“It is not the Germany of the first decade that followed the war - broken, dejected and bowed down with a sense of apprehension and impotence. It is now full of hope and confidence, and of a renewed sense of determination to lead its own life without interference from any influence outside its own frontiers. One man has accomplished this miracle. He is a born leader of men. A magnetic and dynamic personality with a single-minded purpose, a resolute will and a dauntless heart.” - David Lloyd George (Ex-Prime Minister, UK), in the Daily Express (Sep. 17, 1936)

“Without the holocaust we would not have a Jewish state.” - Robert B. Goldmann in the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (Dec. 19, 1997, p. 9)

“The minorities in Poland are supposed to disappear. The Polish policy makes sure that they dont only disappear on the paper. This policy is ruthlessly established and without any attention to the public opinion of the world, of international contracts or the League of Nations. The Ukraine turned to hell under Polish rule. One can say this about Belorussia with even more right. The purpose of the Polish policy is the disappearance of the national minorities on the paper and in reality.” - Manchester Guardian (14th December 1931)

“East Prussia is unquestionable German territory. Since my childhood this is my opinon which didn’t need the affirmation by a plebiscite. And that this is my opinion you may tell your East Prussians in a public gathering in Knigsberg for reassurance.” - The president of the Polish state and Marshall Josef Pilsudski who mysteriously lost his life in the 1930s, to the German foreign minister Gustav Stresemann (10th December 1927)

“The Polish terror in the Ukraine today is worse than anything else in Europe. Ukraine became a country of desperation and destruction. The murderous deeds multiplied. The Germans have been tortured, mutilated, excruciated to death, their corpses were desecrated. Villages and palaces have been robbed, ignited, blown up. The depicted incidents in the official publication of the German government in 1921 exceed the worst actions one can imagine.” - Prof. Dr. Ren Martel in his book, Les frontires orientales de l`Allemagne (Paris 1930) about the Polish raids in Upper Silesia in 1921.

“We know that the war between Poland and Germany cant be prevented. We have to systematically and energetically prepare ourselves for this war. The present generation will see that a new victory at Grunwald will be written into historys pages. But we will battle out this Grunwald in the suburbs of Berlin. Our ideal is to chamfer Poland with borders along the Oder in the west and the Neie at Lausitz and to absorb Prussia from Pregel to the Spree. In this war no prisoners will be made, there will be no place for humanitarian feelings.” - The censored, and closely to the Polish military dictatorship related newspaper Mosarstwowiecz (1930), three years before Hitler came to power.

“We are ready to make a contract with the devil if he helps us fighting against Hitler. Listen: against Germany not only against Hitler. The German blood will be spilled in a future war in such streams like it wasnt seen since the beginning of the world.” -Warsaw newspaper Depesza (20 August 1939)

“We are ready for any war, even with the strongest opponent...” - Polska Zbrojna (25. Mrz 1939), quoted in Walendy, Historische Tatsachen, a.a.O. (Heft 39, S. 16)

“Poland wants war with Germany and Germany will not be able to avoid it, even if it wants to.” - Rydz-Smigly, Chief inspector of the Polish army in a public speech in front of Polish officiers (Summer 1939)

“The Air Ministry agreed that it was most useful to be able to use gas on less sophisticated enemies who would have no idea from where the danger they faced came. The use of gas was banned by the 1925 Geneva protocol.” - The Daily Telegraph (January 3, 1997)

“Perhaps the next time round the way to do it will be to kill women, children and the civilian population.” - Churchill, quoted during the First World War

“Previously it appeared to me to be a just answer to the crimes of the Third Reich, but I’ve since changed my mind. Until the Second World War there was a common consensus that the massacre of civilian populations was illegal.” - Jrg Friedrich, historian

“I am, of course, a Zionist, and have been ever since the Balfour Declaration.” - Churchill quoted in The Official Churchill in One Volume, N.Y. Times (Nov. 6, 1991) by Herbert Mitgang

Eisenhower on German war prisoners:  “God, I hate the Germans...” - Ike The Kike Dwight David Eisenhower in a letter to his wife (September, 1944)

“Prison enclosures are to provide no shelter or other comforts.” - Ike The Kike Dwight David Eisenhower

“Under no circumstances may food supplies be assembled among the local inhabitants in order to deliver them to prisoners of war. Those who violate this command and nevertheless try to circumvent this blockade to allow something to come to the prisoners place themselves in danger of being shot.”- Dwight David Eisenhower

“For years we have blamed the 1.7 million missing German POW’s on the Russians. Until now, no one dug too deeply ... Witnesses and survivors have been interviewed by the author; one Allied officer compared the American camps to Buchenwald.” - Peter Worthington, Ottawa Sun (September 12, 1989)

“Starting in April 1945, the United States Army and the French Army casually annihilated one million [German] men, most of them in American camps . . . Eisenhower’s hatred, passed through the lens of a compliant military bureaucracy, produced the horror of death camps unequalled by anything in American history . . . an enormous war crime.” - Col. Ernest F. Fisher, PhD Lt., 101 st Airborne Division, Senior Historian, United States Army.

“My protests (regarding treatment of the German DEF’S) were met with hostility or indifference, and when I threw our ample rations to them over the barbed wire. I was threatened, making it clear that it was our deliberate policy not to adequately feed them.” - Martin Brech, ex-Private First Class, in Company C of the 14th Infantry, assigned as a guard and interpreter at the Eisenhower Death Camp at Andernach, along the Rhine River.

“When they caught me throwing C- Rations over the fence, they threatened me with imprisonment. One Captain told me that he would shoot me if he saw me again tossing food to the Germans ... Some of the men were really only boys13 years of age...Some of the prisoners were old men drafted by Hitler in his last ditch stand ... I understand that average weight of the prisoners at Andernach was 90 pounds...I have received threats ... Nevertheless, this...has liberated me, for I may now be heard when I relate the horrible atrocity I witnessed as a prison guard for one of ‘Ike’s death camps’ along the Rhine.”

“At first, the women from the nearby town brought food into the camp. The American soldiers took everything away from the women, threw it in a heap and poured gasoline over it and burned it.” - Former camp prisoner.

“Many a sane American family would recoil in horror if they knew how ‘Our Boys’ conduct themselves, with such complete callousness in human relationships over here.” - A serviceman, the TIME Magazine (November 12, 1945)

“Starting in April 1945, the United States Army and the French Army casually annihilated one million [German] men, most of them in American camps . . . Eisenhower’s hatred, passed through the lens of a compliant military bureaucracy, produced the horror of death camps unequaled by anything in American history . . . an enormous war crime.” - Col. Ernest F. Fisher, PhD Lt. 101st Airborne Division, Senior Historian, United States Army.

The Morgenthau Plan:

“I further urged the point that by taking south-western Germany we were in a more congenial part of Germany and further away from the dirty work that the Russians might be doing with the Prussians in Eastern Germany. I was inclined to think that I had made an impression on him, but it was impossible to say. I either then or in my former meeting pressed on him the importance of not partitioning Germany other than the allotment of East Prussia to Russia or Poland, and Alsace Lorraine to France and a possible allotment of Silesia to Poland, namely trimming the outer edges of Germany. Other than those allotments I feared that a division of Germany and a policy which would prevent her from being industrialised would starve her excess population of 30 million people, giving again my description of how she had grown during the period between 1870 and 1914 by virtue of her industrialisation...” - Diary of Henry Stimmson, (August 25, 1944)

“Germany must be turned into a waste land, as happened there during the 30-year War.” - Das Morgenthau-Tagebuch, The Morgenthau Dairy (p. 11)

“The Morgenthau Plan for Germany ... became part of the Potsdam Agreement, a solemn declaration of policy and undertaking for action ... signed by the United States of America, Great Britain and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.” - New York Post (Nov. 24, 1947)

Allied war crimes:


“At the edge of town, on the left side of the road, stands the large inn ‘Weisser Krug’ ... In the farmyard further down the road stood a cart, to which four naked women were nailed through their hands in a cruciform position. Behind the Weisser Krug towards Gumbinnen is a square with a monument to the Unknown Soldier. Beyond is another large inn, ‘Roter Krug’. Near it, parallel to the road, stood a barn and to each of its two doors a naked woman was nailed through the hands, in a crucified posture. In the dwellings, we found a total of seventy-two women, including children, and one old man, 74, all dead ... all murdered in a bestial manner, except only for a few who had bullet holes in their necks. Some babies had their heads bashed in. In one room we found a woman, 84 years old, sitting on a sofa ... half of whose head had been sheared off with an axe or a spade ... We carried the corpses to the village cemetary where they lay to await a foreign medical commission ... In the meantime, a nurse from Insterburg came, a native of Nemmersdorf, who looked for her parents. Among the corpses were her mother, 72, and her father, 74, the only man among the dead. She also established that all the dead were Nemmersdorfers. On the fourth day the bodies were buried in two graves. Only on the following day did the medical commission arrive, and the tombs had to be reopened. Barn doors were set on blocks on which to lay the bodies so that the commission could examine them. This foreign commission unanimously established that all the women, as well as the girls from eight to twelve years and even the woman of 84 years had been raped. After the examination by the commission, the bodies were again buried.” - Karl Potrek’s report, a civilian from the capital city of Knigsberg, recruited into the Volksturm.

“They were all exhausted and starved and miserable ... A child only half alive ... A woman in the most terrible picture of despair I’ve seen ... Even when you see it, it’s impossible to believe ... God it was terrible.” - Robert Allen, Letter from Berlin, Reading magazine (February, 1946)

“When we reached Metgethen, we were confronted with a gruesome sight: We found several hundred dead German soldiers, many of whom had been disfigured beyond recognition. There were murdered civilians in just about every home, likewise disfigured in a most bestial manner. For example, some women had their breasts cut off, and in backyard gardens we found scarcely clad women who had been hanged upside down. In one house we came across a 63-year-old woman still alive. Crying, she told us that she had been raped by 12 to 15 Russians. She lay on the floor covered in blood. This old woman’s daughter had escaped into the forest nearby, but her one-year-old child was abducted by the Russians. In the streets of Metgethen, and also at the railroad station, we found approximately15 baby carriages, some overturned, all empty. We concluded that this meant the Russians had also abducted these babies.” - Horst A., at the time a driver for the Intelligence Reserve Detachment I, Knigsberg.

“Its our task to mercilessly declare war to Germany, the public enemy number one.” - Bernhard Lecache, President of the Jewish World League (9. November 1938)

“Our Jewish interests demand the final destruction of Germany.” - W. Jabotinski, founder of “Irgun Zwai Leumi” (January 1934)

“Hitler doesnt want war but he will be forced to it, and in fact soon. England has the final say like in 1914.” - Zionist Emil Ludwig Cohn “Annalen”

“Although Hitler may want to prevent this war, which can devour him, in the last moment, he will be forced to war anyway.” -Emil Ludwig Cohn (1938)

“I asked Joe Kennedy (US embassador in London) about his talks with Roosevelt and N. Chamberlain in 1938. He said it had been Chamberlains belief in 1939 that Great Britain has nothing in its hands to fight and therefore wouldnt dare to go to war against Hitler...Neither the French nor the English would have made Poland a motive for war if they hadnt been continuously spurred on by Washington...America and the World-Jewry have driven England to war.” - US defence minister J. Forrestal 27.12.1945 in his diary (The Forrestal Diaries, New York, 1951, S. 121 ff)

“We managed to drag the United States into the First World War and if they (the US) do what we demand in regards to Palestine and the Jewish armed forces, then we can get the Jews in the USA to drag the United States into this one (the Second World War) too.” - Weizmann to Chuchill (September 1941)

“We won this war with atrocity propaganda...and now we will start more than ever! We will continue this atrocity propaganda, we will increase it until nobody will accept one good word from the Germans anymore, until everything is destroyed which might have upheld them sympathies in other countries, and until they will be so confused that they dont know what to do anymore. When this is reached, when they begin to pollute their own nest, and this not reluctantly but with hasty willingness to obey the winners, only then the victory is complete. It will never be definite. The reeducation demands thorough, steadfast nurture like English lawn. Only one moment of inattention and the weed will break through, this ineradicable weed of historic truth.” - Sefton Delmer, former British chief propagandist after the capitulation in 1945 to the German expert on international law Prof. Grimm.

“When the National Socialists and their friends cry or whisper that this [the war] is brought about by Jews, they are perfectly right.” - The Jewish magazine Sentinel of Chicago (8 October 1940)

“For months now the struggle against Germany is waged by each Jewish community at each conference in all our syndicates and by each Jew all over the world. There is reason to believe that our part in this struggle has general value. We will start a spiritual and material war of all the world against Germany’s ambitions to become once again a great nation, to recover lost territories and colonies. But our Jewish interests demand Germany’s total destruction, collectively and individually. The German nation is a threat to us Jews.” - Vladimir Jabotinsky, founder of the Irgun Zvai Leumi terrorist organisation, Mascha Rjetach(January 1934)

“Even if Hitler at the last moment would want to avoid war which would destroy him he will, in spite of his wishes, be compelled to wage war.” - Emil Ludwig Cohen in his book The New Holy Alliance( Strasburg, 1938)

“It is our task to organise the moral and cultural blockade of Germany and disperse this nation. It is up to us to start a merciless war.” - Bernard Lechache in The Right to Live (December 1938)

“The millions of Jews living in America, England, France, North Africa and South, not forgetting Palestine, have decided to carry on the war in Germany to the very end. It is to be a war of extermination.” - ‘The Jewish newspaper Central Blad Voor Israeliten in Nederlands (13 September 1939)

“It was the World Jewish Congress that saw to it that the Nuremberg Trials were held, for which it supplied experienced advice and most valuable evidence - and it was the World Jewish Congress that had such far-reaching connections during the war that these extended even into the German Foreign Office, and that it received information even long before the British Secret Service received it.” - Maurice Perlzweig, Chief of the British Section of the World Jewish Congress, said in an address in Langside Hall in London on November 27, 1949, Jewish Chronicle, London (December 16, 1949. Quoted in: UN, 8/83 p. 4.)

“The Jewish World Congress has been at perpetual war with Germany for seven years.” - Maurice Perlzweig, Chief of the British Section of the World Jewish CongressFebruary 26, 1940, in an address according to the Toronto Evening Telegram, quoted by Dr. Hans Riegelmann in: UN, 8/83, p. 4.

“The Israeli people around the world declare economic and financial war against Germany. Fourteen million Jews stand together as one man, to declare war against Germany. The Jewish wholesaler will forsake his firm, the banker his stock exchange, the merchant his commerce and the pauper his pitiful shed in order to join together in a holy war against Hitler’s people.” - Daily Express (March 24, 1933)

“Each of you, Jew and Gentile alike, who has not already enlisted in this sacred war should do so now and here. It is not sufficient that you should buy no goods made in Germany. You must refuse to deal with any merchant or shopkeeper who sells any German-made goods or who patronises German ships or shipping.... we will undermine the Hitler regime and bring the German people to their senses by destroying their export trade on which their very existence depends.” - Samuel Undermeyer, in a Radio Broadcast on WABC, New York (August 6, 1933, reported in the New York Times, August 7, 1933)

“Joining with Samuel Untermeyer in calling for a war against Germany, Bernard Baruch, at the same time, was promoting preparations for war against Germany. ‘I emphasised that the defeat of Germany and Japan and their elimination from world trade would give Britain a tremendous opportunity to swell her foreign commerce in both volume and profit.’” - Baruch, The Public Years, by Bernard M. Baruch (p.347)

[Samuel Untermeyer was a Jewish leader and close friend of presidents Wilson and Roosevelt.

Bernard Baruch was a presidential adviser to Wilson, Roosevelt and Truman.]

“This declaration called the war against Germany, which was now determined on, a ‘holy war’. This war was to be carried out against Germany to its conclusion, to her destruction”. - Dr. Franz J. Scheidl, Geschichte der Verfemung Deutschlands

“War in Europe in 1934 was inevitable.” - H. Morgenthau, Secretary of the U.S. Treasury, Hearst Press, September, 1933 (also quoted in The Palestine Plot by B. Jenson, p. 11)


“For months now the struggle against Germany is waged by each Jewish community, at each conference, in all our syndicates, and by each Jew all over the world. There is reason to believe that our part in this struggle has general value. We will trigger a spiritual and material war of all the world against Germany’s ambitions to become once again a great nation, to recover lost territories and colonies. But our Jewish interests demand the complete destruction of Germany. Collectively and individually, the German nation is a threat to us Jews.” - Vladimir Jabotinsky (founder of the Jewish terrorist group, Irgun Zvai Leumi) in Mascha Rjetsch, January, 1934 (also quoted in Histoire de l’Arme Allemande by Jacques Benoist-Mechin, Vol. IV, p. 303)

“Hitler will have no war (does not want war), but we will force it on him, not this year, but soon.” - Emil Ludwig Cohn in Les Annales, June, 1934 (also quoted in his book The New Holy Alliance).

“We Jews are going to bring a war on Germany.” - David A. Brown, National Chairman, United Jewish Campaign, 1934 (quoted in I Testify Against The Jews by Robert Edward Edmondson, page 188 and The Jewish War of Survival by Arnold Leese, page 52)

“We want to bring about a deep hatred for the Germans, for German soldiers, sailors, and airmen. We must hate until we win.” -Lord Beaverbrook, quoted in Niemals! by Heinrich Goitsch.

“There is only one power which really counts. The power of political pressure. We Jews are the most powerful people on earth, because we have this power, and we know how to apply it.” - Vladimir Jabotinsky in Jewish Daily Bulletin (July 27, 1935)

“Before the end of the year, an economic bloc of England, Russia, France and the U.S.A will be formed to bring the German and Italian economic systems to their knees.” - Paul Dreyfus, La Vie de Tanger (May 15, 1938)

“On the 3rd of June, 1938, the American Hebrew boasted that they had Jews in the foremost positions of influence in Britain, Russia and France, and that these “three sons of Israel will be sending the Nazi dictator to hell.” - Joseph Trimble, The American Hebrew.

“Germany is our public enemy number one. It is our object to declare war without mercy against her. One may be sure of this: We will lead that war!” - Bernard Lecache, the president of the “International League Against Racism and Anti-Semitism,” in its newspaper Droit de Vivre (Right to Life) (9 November, 1938)

“The war now proposed is for the purpose of establishing Jewish hegemony throughout the world.” - Brigadier General George Van Horn Mosely, The New York Tribune (March 29, 1939)

“I wish to confirm in the most explicit manner, the declaration which I and my colleagues made during the last months, and especially in the last week: that the Jews “stand by Great Britain and will fight on the side of the democracies.” Our urgent desire is to give effect to these declarations. We wish to do so in a way entirely consonant with the general scheme of British action, and therefore would place ourselves, in matters big and small, under the co-ordinating direction of His Majesty’s Government. The Jewish Agency is ready to enter into immediate arrangements for utilizing Jewish manpower, technical ability, resources, etc.” -Chaim Weizmann, President of the World Jewish Congress, Head of the Jewish Agency and later President of Israel, the London Times, September 5, 1939, and the London Jewish Chronicle, September 8, 1939.

“The millions of Jews who live in America, England and France, North and South Africa, and, not to forget those in Palestine, are determined to bring the war of annihilation against Germany to its final end.” - Central Blad Voor Israeliten in Nederland (September 13, 1939)

“Stop talking about peace conditions! Break Germany in pieces!” - The Daily Herald, No.7426 (9 December, 1939)

“The Jews, taken collectively, view this war as a holy war.” - The Daily Herald, No.7450, 1939, quoted in Reichstagsbrand, Au**lrung einer historischen Legende, by U. Backes, K.H.Janen, E.Jesse, H.Khler, H.Mommsen, E.Tobias.

“Even if we Jews are not physically at your side in the trenches, we are morally with you. This war is our war and you fight it with us.” - Schalom Asch, Les Nouvelles Litteraires (February 10, 1940)

“In losing Germany, Jewry lost a territory from which it exerted power. Therefore it was determined to reconquer it.” - Louis Marschalko, The World Conquerors : The Real War Criminals

“The World Jewish Congress has been at war with Germany for seven years.” - Rabbi M. Perlzweig (head of the British Section of the World Jewish Congress), Toronto Evening Telegram (February 26, 1940)

“The Second World War is being fought for the defense of the fundamentals of Judaism.” - Rabbi Felix Mendlesohn, Chicago Sentinel (October 8, 1942)

“We are not denying and are not afraid to confess that this war is our war and that it is waged for the liberation of Jewry... Stronger than all fronts together is our front, that of Jewry. We are not only giving this war our financial support on which the entire war production is based, we are not only providing our full propaganda power which is the moral energy that keeps this war going. The guarantee of victory is predominantly based on weakening the enemy forces, on destroying them in their own country, within the resistance. And we are the Trojan horses in the enemy’s fortress. Thousands of Jews living in Europe constitute the principal factor in the destruction of our enemy. There, our front is a fact and the most valuable aid for victory.” - Chaim Weizmann, President of the World Jewish Congress, Head of the Jewish Agency and later President of Israel, in a Speech on December3, 1942, in New York.

“It is untrue that I or anyone else in Germany wanted war in 1939. It was wanted and provoked solely by international statesmen either of Jewish origin or working for Jewish interests. Nor had I ever wished that after the appalling first World War, there would ever be a second against either England or America.” - Adolf Hitler (April 1945)

“Played golf with Joe Kennedy (U.S. Ambassador to Britain). He says that Chamberlain stated that America and world Jewry forced England into World War II.” - James Forrestal, Secretary of the Navy (later Secretary of Defense), Diary, December 27, 1945 entry.



1901: The Jews from the colonies set up in Palestine by Edmond James de Rothschild, send a delegation to him which tell him, “If you wish to save the Yishuv (The Jewish settlement) first take your hands from it, and for once permit the colonists to have the possibility of correcting for themselves what needs correcting.” Edmond James de Rothschild is very angry about this and states, “I created the Yishuv, I alone. Therefore no men, neither colonists nor organisations have the right to interfere in my plans.” The Rothschild banking-house in Frankfurt, Germany, M. A. von Rothschild und Söhne, closes as there is no male Rothschild heir to take it on. 1902: Philippe de Rothschild born.

 1905: A group of Rothschild backed Zionist Jews led by Georgi Apollonovich Gapon attempt to overthrow the Tsar in Russia in a Communist Coup. They fail and are forced to flee Russia only to be given refuge in Germany.

 The Jewish Encyclopaedia (Vol. 2, p.497) states, “It is a somewhat curious sequel to the attempt to set up a Catholic competitor to the Rothschilds that at the present time the latter are the guardians of the papal treasure.”

1906: The Rothschilds claim that due to growing instability in the region and increasing competition from Rockefeller (the Rockefeller family are Rothschild descendants through a female bloodline) owned Standard Oil, this is why they sell their Caspian and Black Sea Petroleum Company to Royal Dutch and Shell. This is another example of the Rothschilds trying to hide their true wealth.

1907: Rothschild, Jacob Schiff, the head of Kuhn, Loeb and Co., in a speech to the New York Chamber of Commerce, warns that, “Unless we have a Central Bank with adequate control of credit resources, this country is going to undergo the most severe and far-reaching money panic in its history.” Suddenly America finds itself in the middle of another typical run of the mill Rothschild-engineered financial crisis, which ruins as usual ruins the lives of millions of innocent people throughout America and makes billions for the Rothschilds.

1909: Jacob Schiff founds the National Advancement for the Association of the Coloured People (NAACP). This was done to incite black people into rioting, looting and other forms of disorder, in order to cause a rift between the black and white communities. Jewish historian, Howard Sachar, states the following in his book, “A History of the Jews in America,” “In 1914, Professor Emeritus Joel Spingarn of Columbia University became chairman of the NAACP and recruited for its board such Jewish leaders as Jacob Schiff, Jacob Billikopf, and Rabbi Stephen Wise.” Other Ashkenazi Jew co-founders included Julius Rosenthal, Lillian Wald and Rabbi Emil G. Hirsch. It was not until 1920 that the NAACP appointed its first black president, James Weldon Johnson. Maurice de Rothschild marries Ashkenazi Jew, Noémie Halphen.

 1911: Werner Sombart, in his book, “The Jews and Modern Capitalism,” stated that from 1820 on, it was the, “Age of the Rothschild,” and concluded that there was, “Only one power in Europe, and that is Rothschild.”

1912: In the December issue of, “Truth,” magazine, George R. Conroy states of banker Jacob Schiff, “Mr Schiff is head of the great private banking house of Kuhn, Loeb, and co, which represents the Rothschilds interests on this side of the Atlantic. He has been described as financial strategist and has been for years the financial minister of the great impersonal power known as Standard Oil.” He was hand in glove with the Harrimans, the Goulds, and the Rockefellers in all their railroad enterprises and has become the dominant power in the railroad and financial power of America.”

1913: On March 4, Woodrow Wilson is elected the 28th President of the United States. Shortly after he is inaugurated, he is visited in the White House by Ashkenazi Jew, Samuel Untermyer, of law firm, Guggenheim, Untermyer, and Marshall, who tries to blackmail him for the sum of $40,000 in relation to an affair Wilson had whilst he was a professor at Princeton University, with a fellow professor’s wife. President Wilson does not have the money, so Untermyer volunteers to pay the $40,000 out of his own pocket to the woman Wilson had had the affair with, on the condition that Wilson promise to appoint to the first vacancy on the United States Supreme Court a nominee to be recommended to President Wilson by Untermyer. Wilson agrees to this. Jacob Schiff sets up the Anti Defamation League (ADL) in the United States. This organisation is formed to slander anyone who questions or challenges the Rothschild global conspiracy as, “anti-semitic.” Strangely enough, the same year that they do this they also set up their last and current central bank in America, the Federal Reserve. Congressman Charles Lindbergh stated following the passing of the Federal Reserve Act on December 23, “The Act establishes the most gigantic trust on earth. When the President signs this Bill, the invisible government of the monetary power will be legalized…….The greatest crime of the ages is perpetrated by this banking and currency bill.” It is important to note that the Federal Reserve is a private company, it is neither Federal nor does it have any Reserve. It is conservatively estimated that profits exceed $150 billion per year and the Federal Reserve has never once in its history published accounts.

1914: The start of World War I. In this war, the German Rothschilds loan money to the Germans, the British Rothschilds loan money to the British, and the French Rothschilds loan money to the French. Futhermore, the Rothschilds have control of the three European news agencies, Wolff (est. 1849) in Germany, Reuters (est. 1851) in England, and Havas (est. 1835) in France. The Rothschilds use Wolff to manipulate the German people into a fervour for war. From around this time, the Rothschilds are rarely reported in the media, because they own the media.

 1916: On June 4, Ashkenazi Jew, Louis Dembitz Brandeis is appointed to the Supreme Court of the United States by President Wilson as per his agreed blackmail payment to Samuel Untermyer some three years earlier. Justice Brandeis is also the elected leader of the Executive Committee for Zionist Affairs, a position he has held since 1914. The middle of World War II Germany was winning the war as they were being financed by the Rothschilds to a greater extent than France, Italy and England, because Rothschilds, did not want to support the Tsar in Russia, and of course Russia was on the same side as France, Italy and England. Then a significant event occurred. Germany, although they were winning the war and not one foreign soldier had set foot on their soil, offered armistice to Britain with no requirement of reparations. The Rothschilds were anxious to make sure this didn’t happen as they were expecting to make far more money off this war, so they played another card they had up their sleeve.

Whilst the British were considering Germany’s offer, Rothschild agent Louis Brandeis sends a Zionist delegation from America to Britain to promise to bring America into the war on the side of the British, provided the British agree to give the land of Palestine to the Rothschilds. The Rothschilds wanted Palestine for the following reason: They had great business interests in the far east and desired their own state in that area along with their own military which they could use as an aggressor to any state that threatened those interests. The British subsequently agree to the deal for Palestine and the Zionists in London contact their counterparts in America and inform them of this fact. Suddenly all the major newspapers in America that up to that point had been pro-German turned on Germany running propaganda pieces such as: German soldiers were killing Red Cross Nurses; German soldiers were cutting off babies hands, etc, in order to manipulate the American public against the Germans.

This same year, President Woodrow Wilson, ran a re-election campaign under the slogan, “Re-Elect The Man Who Will Keep Your Sons Out Of The War.”

On December 12, Germany and her allies offer peace terms to end the war.

1917: As a result of Germany’s offer of peace the Rothschild war machine goes into overdrive in America, spreading propaganda which leads to President Wilson under the instructions of American Zionist leader and Supreme Court Justice, Louis Dembitz Brandeis, reneging on his promise to the electorate and taking America into the first world war on April 6. As per the Rothschild Zionist promise to the British, to take America into the war, they decide they want something in writing from the British to prove that they will uphold their side of the bargain. The British Foreign Secretary, Arthur James Balfour therefore drafts a letter which is commonly known as the, “Balfour Declaration,” which is reprinted below.

 Foreign Office November 2nd, 1917

 Dear Lord Rothschild,

 I have much pleasure in conveying to you, on behalf of His Majesty’s Government, the following declaration of sympathy with Jewish Zionist aspirations which has been submitted to, and approved by, the Cabinet.

 His Majesty’s Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.

 I should be grateful if you would bring this declaration to the knowledge of the Zionist Federation.

 Yours sincerely,

 Arthur James Balfour

 The Rothschilds order the execution by the Bolsheviks they control, of Tsar Nicholas II and his entire family in Russia, even though the Tsar had already abdicated on March 2. This is both to get control of the country and an act of revenge for Tsar Alexander I blocking their world government plan in 1815 at the Congress Of Vienna, and Tsar Alexander II siding with President Abraham Lincoln in 1864. It is extremely important for them to slaughter the entire family including women and children in order to make good on the promise to do so made by Nathan Mayer Rothschild in 1815. It is designed to show the world what happens if you ever attempt to cross the Rothschilds. (NB. Anastasia escaped this attack)

 U.S. Congressman Oscar Callaway informs Congress that J. P. Morgan is a Rothschild front and has taken control of the American media industry. He states, “In March, 1915, the J.P. Morgan interests, the steel, shipbuilding, and powder interest, and their subsidiary organizations, got together 12 men high up in the newspaper world and employed them to select the most influential newspapers in the United States and sufficient number of them to control generally the policy of the daily press… …They found it was only necessary to purchase the control of 25 of the greatest papers…An agreement was reached. The policy of the papers was bought, to be paid for by the month, an editor was furnished for each paper to properly supervise and edit information regarding the questions of preparedness, militarism, financial policies, and other things of national and international nature considered vital to the interests of the purchasers.”

1919: In January, Ashkenazi Jews, Karl Liebknecht and Rosa Luxemburg, are killed as they attempt to lead another Rothschild funded Communist coup, this time in Berlin, Germany. The Versailles peace conference is held to decide reparations that the Germans need to pay to the victors following the end of the first world war. A delegation of 117 Zionists headed up by Ashkenazi Jew, Bernard Baruch, bring up the subject of the promise of Palestine for them. At this point the Germans realised why America had turned on them and under whose influence, the Rothschilds.

The Germans, naturally, felt they had been betrayed by the Zionists. This is because, at the time the Rothschilds made their deal with Britain for Palestine, in exchange for bringing America into the war, Germany was the most friendly country in the world towards the Jews, indeed the German Emancipation Edict of 1822 guaranteed Jews in Germany all civil rights enjoyed by Germans. Also, Germany was the only country in Europe which did not place restrictions on Jews, even giving them refuge when they had to flee from Russia after their first attempted Communist coup failed there in 1905.

Nevertheless, the Rothschilds had held up their side of the bargain to spill the blood of millions of innocents and as a result, Palestine is confirmed as a Jewish homeland, and whilst its handover to the Rothschilds takes place it is to remain under the control of Britain as the Rothschilds control Britain. At that time less than one percent of the population of Palestine was Jewish. Interestingly, the host of the Versailles peace conference is its boss, Baron Edmond de Rothschild. The Versailles peace conference is also used as an attempt by the Rothschilds to set up a world government under the pretext of ending all wars (which they create). This was called the, “League of Nations.” Fortunately not enough countries accepted it and so it soon died.

On March 29th The Times of London reports on the Bolsheviks in Russia,”One of the curious features of the Bolshevist movement is the high percentage of non-Russian elements among its leaders. Of the twenty or thirty commissaries, or leaders, who provide the central machinery of the Bolshevist movement, not less than 75% were Jews.” It is reported that the Rothschilds were angry with the Russians because they were not prepared to allow them to form a central bank within their nation. They therefore gathered groups of Jewish spies and sent them into Russia to drum up a revolution for the benefit of the common man, which was actually a takeover of Russia by a Rothschild-controlled satanic elite. These Jewish spies were, in age-old deceptive Ashkenazi tradition, given Russian names, for example Trotsky was a member of the first group and his original name was Bronstein. These groups were sent to areas throughout Russia to incite riots and rebellion. The Jewish Post International Edition, week ending January 24th 1991, confirms Vladimir Lenin was Jewish. Lenin is also on record as having stated, “The establishment of a central bank is 90% of communizing a nation.” These Jewish, Rothschild funded Bolsheviks would go on in the course of history to slaughter 60 million Christians and Non-Jews in Soviet controlled territory. Indeed the author Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn in his work, “Gulag Archipelago, Vol 2,” affirms that Zionist Jews created and administered the organized Soviet concentration camp system in which these tens of millions of Christians and Non-Jews died. On page 79 of this book he even names the administrators of this the greatest killing machine in the history of the world. They are Aron Solts, Yakov Rappoport, Lazar Kogan, Matvei Berman, Genrikh Yagoda, and Naftaly Frenkel. All six are Zionist Jews. In 1970 Solzhenitsyn would be awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for literature.

 N. M. Rothschild & Sons’ are given a permanent role to fix the world’s daily gold price. This takes place in the City of London offices, daily at 1100 hours, in the same room until 2004: https://thedaysofnoah.wordpress.com/2011/01/03/the-rothschild-1901-1919-the-secret-creators-of-world-war-1/

HISTORY: 1933 – Jewish Declaration of War on Germany

... during this period there were some unusual developments at work: The spring of 1933 also witnessed the beginning of a period of private cooperation between the German government and the Zionist movement in Germany and Palestine (and actually worldwide) to increase the flow of German-Jewish immigrants and capital to Palestine.

The modern-day supporters of Zionist Israel and many historians have succeeded in keeping this Nazi-Zionist pact a secret to the general public for decades and while most Americans have no concept of the possibility that there could have been outright collaboration between the Nazi leadership and the founders of what became the state of Israel, the truth has begun to emerge.

For all the modern-day wailing by worldwide supporters of Israel (not to mention the Israelis themselves) about “the Holocaust”, they neglect to mention that making the situation in Germany as uncomfortable for the Jews as possible – in cooperation with German National Socialism – was part of the plan.

According to Jewish historian Walter Laqueur and many others, German Jews were far from convinced that immigration to Palestine was the answer. Furthermore, although the majority of German Jews refused to consider the Zionists as their political leaders, it is clear that Hitler protected and cooperated with the Zionists for the purposes of implementing the final solution: the mass transfer of Jews to the Middle East.

Edwin Black, in his massive tome The Transfer Agreement (Macmillan, 1984), stated that although most Jews did not want to flee to Palestine at all, due to the Zionist movement’s influence within Nazi Germany a Jew’s best chance of getting out of Germany was by emigrating to Palestine. In other words, the Transfer Agreement itself mandated that Jewish capital could only to go Palestine.

Thus, according to the Zionists, a Jew could leave Germany only if he went to the Levant.

The primary difficulty with the Transfer Agreement (or even the idea of such an agreement) was that the English were demanding, as a condition of immigration, that each immigrant pay 1,000 pounds sterling upon arrival in Haifa or elsewhere. The difficulty was that such hard currency was nearly impossible to come by in a cash-strapped and radically inflationary Germany. This was the main idea behind the final Transfer Agreement. Laqueur writes:

“A large German bank would freeze funds paid in by immigrants in blocked accounts for German exporters, while a bank in Palestine would control the sale of German goods to Palestine, thereby providing the immigrants with the necessary foreign currency on the spot. Sam Cohen, co-owner of Hanoaiah Ltd. and initiator of the transfer endeavors, was however subjected to long-lasting objections from his own people and finally had to concede that such a transfer agreement could only be concluded on a much higher level with a bank of its own rather than that of a private company. The renowned Anglo-Palestine Bank in London would be included in this transfer deal and create a trust company for [this] purpose.”

Of course, this is of major historical importance in dealing with the relationship between Zionism and National Socialism in Germany in the 1930s. The relationship was not one merely of mutual interest and political favoritism on the part of Hitler, but a close financial relationship with German banking families and financial institutions as well.

For the Zionists, both the denunciations of German policies towards Jews (to keep Jews frightened), plus the re-invigoration of the German economy (for the sake of final resettlement) was imperative for the Zionist movement. Ironically, today the Zionist leaders of Israel complain bitterly about the horrific and inhuman regime of the National Socialists. So the fraud continues: https://zionistreport.com/2016/01/the-jewish-declaration-of-war-on-germany/


The monotheistic religions have a rich history of slaughter and butchery. Far better that we try to respect each other as human beings.

Of the many reactions to the recent terrorist events, perhaps the most controversial concerns the degree to which it is permissible to pillory religion and religious institutions. Should free speech extend to mockery of the great faiths, or should respect for their followers stay the hand of satirists and silence the scoffers? Do those who fail to show “appropriate” respect deserve, if not a bullet in the head then at least, as  the Pontiff seems to believe, a punch on the nose? “You cannot,” his holiness tells us, “insult the faith of others.” Implicit in this pronouncement is that religions are and should be inviolable and therefore unlike other kinds of human institution.

Let’s begin by recognizing that spiritual beliefs tend come in two basic varieties: polytheistic which accommodate multiple deities, and monotheistic which acknowledge only one.

Hindus, Buddhists, followers of Tao and the philosophy of Kung Fu-Tzu (Confucius) belong to the first variety. They make no claims to exclusivity. Their adherents seldom demand that others should worship as they do, nor insist on their superiority to others. Above all they don’t stipulate that theirs are the only beliefs worthy of veneration. Hinduism is notably generous in its readiness to acknowledge multiple incarnations of the divine, as many as three hundred and thirty million in some accounts, meaning an infinite number, the more the merrier, bring yours along, He or She will do as well as any other - for all are ways to reach Brahman, the sacred power that sustains all things.

The Abrahamic God demands subservience and a great deal of bowing and scraping. Christians—sinners by definition—spend much time on their knees begging forgiveness. Muslims bow in the direction of Mecca five times a day. Jews don’t kneel. 

“Banning circumcision (along with Kosher & Halal Killing) unites almost all Jews and almost all Muslims, so it’s killing two birds with one stone-and a very pretty stone at that.” NY & Jerusalem based Rabbi Josh Spinner & CEO of the Ronald S. Lauder Foundation, responded when asked about Muslims & Jews coming together.

Yet ANOTHER story that falls into both our Combating Islamism and Combating Zionism categories!

What are the chances?

Remember when we told you why the EKP fights Zionism with as much fervour and gusto as we combat the scourge that is Islamism?

We wrote, “The racist anti-western ideologies of Zionism & Islamism are two sides of the same proverbial shekel, born in the same sandbox and of the same innate hatred.

While countless nationalist groups pander to Zionist groups with links to the states and organisations that fund ISIS and are responsible for the killing of innocent Christians across the mid east, we refuse to EVER compromise with either Semitic menace.

Make no mistake, both Islamists and Zionists despise our Western culture with equal levels of loathing – and work in unison to harm us. Zionists just do a better job hiding it.

From their shared aversion to dogs and pork, to the manner in which they cull their livestock and ritualistically circumcise their children – the commonalities run as deep as the ocean, and differences, as shallow as a summer puddle.”

What a splendid segue into our coverage of the child circumcision debate raging in Germany and the fact that Jewish & Muslim groups are standing side by side in their Jihad/amidah (Islamic & Hebrew for resistance) against German national sovereignty.

Our German correspondent Helmut Schmidt reported that, “A left leaning Cologne court Judge decided that the circumcision of minors went against a child’s interests because it led to a physical alteration of the body, and because people other than the child were determining its religious affiliation. He did so based on the individual rights of the child trumping the religious rights of the parent.

Well it appears both Jewish and Islamic religious leaders have their panties up in a bunch with the courts decision, claiming that Germany has appeased the far right (remember the judge was in fact a liberal) and undermined the religious authority of both Islam and Judaism, as well as contravened Germany’s Constitution.

Ali Demir, chairman of the Religious Community of Islam in Germany, said: “I find the ruling adversarial to the cause of integration and discriminatory against all the parties concerned.”

Boo effin’ hoo.

Dieter Graumann, president of Germany’s Central Council of Jews, echoed Demir’s anger at the decision claiming that it was “an egregious and insensitive measure” which amounted to “an unprecedented and dramatic intervention in religious communities’ right of determination”. He continued, “Is kosher and halal slaughter next?”

I bloody well hope so!

The leftist Guardian wrote that:

“The ruling followed a lengthy legal battle, sparked when a Muslim couple decided to have their son circumcised, specifically for religious reasons, by a Muslim doctor in Cologne. The doctor, identified only as Dr K, carried out the circumcision on the four-year-old boy in November 2010, before giving the wound four stitches. The same evening, he visited the family at home to check up on the boy. When the boy began bleeding again two days later, his parents took him to the casualty department of Cologne’s University hospital. The hospital contacted the police, who then launched an investigation. The doctor was charged with bodily harm, and the case was taken to court in spite of both Muslim and Jewish groups protesting the decision.

While the court acquitted Dr K on the grounds that he had not broken any law, it concluded that circumcision of minors for religious reasons should be outlawed, and that neither parental consent nor religious freedom justified the procedure. It ruled that in future doctors who carried out circumcisions should be punished.

The court weighed up three articles from the basic law: the rights of parents, the freedom of religious practice and the right of the child to physical integrity, before coming to the conclusion that the procedure was not in the interests of the child.

It rejected the defence that circumcision is considered hygienic in many cultures, one of the main reasons it is carried out in the US, Britain and in Germany.

After much deliberation, it concluded that a circumcision, “even when done properly by a doctor with the permission of the parents, should be considered as bodily harm if it is carried out on a boy unable to give his own consent”.

‘Against the interests of a child’

It ruled the child’s body would be “permanently and irreparably changed”, and that this alteration went “against the interests of a child to decide for himself later on to what religion he wishes to belong”.

He said unlike politicians who have long faced pressure to deal with the issue, “the court did not allow itself to be scared off by charges of antisemitism or religious intolerance”.

Demir predicted a ban in Germany would lead to a rise in “circumcision tourism in neighbouring countries in Europe”.

Condemnation also came from elsewhere in Europe, with Rabbi Aryeh Goldberg of the Brussels-based Rabbinical Centre of Europe calling the ruling “fatal to freedom of religion”. He told the Jerusalem daily Haaretz that it “contravened the EU’s convention on human rights, to which Germany is subservient and harms the basic freedom of religion enshrined in the German Constitution”.

Quite hilariously German women’s rights groups and Marxist social policy makers echoed those same sentiments, instead of railing in defence of childrens rights-something I thought they were supposed to care about.

Their reasoning?

Lesbian Jewish feminist Katrin Altpeter, social minister in the state of Baden-Württemberg, claimed that “by banning circumcision it would put male and female circumcision on the same footing, when they were “in no way comparable”.

Maddening logic.

And here I thought that leftists cared about children’s rights: https://www.europeanknightsproject.com/jews-muslims-join-forces-fight-germans-war-circumcision/



Watch here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vNarjHJP_sg

As the Alt-Right grows it is important to look to the future and secure self-determination for our people. Watch here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TLloRW_qmJc


This documentary shows how our politicians are bought and paid for by the Israeli/Jewish Lobby, becoming Israel-firsters who couldn’t give a damn about Americans: http://www.renegadetribune.com/total-control-united-states-jewish-lobby/


Although Jewish activists claim that the large number of Jews with positions of power in Hollywood makes no difference, it makes a very large difference. Even Joe Biden thinks (correctly) that Jews were behind the gay marriage movement. In guarded optimism, we might look to the future and hope that some influential Jews will be able to look at this history without their ethnic blinders and come to see their own best interests lie with a renewed European America. More here: http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2016/09/the-alt-right-and-the-jews/ 


Edmund Connelly exposes how self-resentment and the notion of cultural pathology have been consistently, deliberately, and malevolently, planted in white minds through jewish scripted, jewish directed and jewish produced Hollywood movies.

Before the Internet revolution, this kind of ethnic intellectual warfare could be waged covertly and with relative impunity due to the effective jewish media monopoly.

Those days are over, and jewish Hollywood’s racist propaganda of defaming whites and white culture in movies and television is being exposed to a critical and intelligent audience worldwide.

Watch here: https://youtu.be/BhYbiHUTD7Q

ELITE PEDOPHILE RINGS; Mainstream Media Finally Exposes Elite Pedophile Rings in a Horrifying Episode of Dr Phil: http://www.anonews.co/dr-phil-show/ 

HOLLYWOOD CONSPIRACY FILES: SECRETS HOLLYWOOD DOESN’T WANT YOU TO KNOW (VIDEO) http://talknetwork.com/2017-10-17-hollywood-conspiracy-files-dark-secrets-the-industry-doesnt-want-you-to-know-video.html


Paul Gottfried talks about how a lot of Jews look at the Holocaust and white people and the effects those views have on white people, black people and others, and the Western world as a whole. And whites bringing up the Holocaust and often reminding others of it, which often happens without any reason because the media and the education system talks about it incredibly often, despite the fact that there were bigger genocides even in the same century the Shoah happened, basically contribute to decline and destruction of their own race without really realizing it. Video by Property and Freedom Society. Watch here: https://youtu.be/NYpapo4Q3CU


“You must understand. The leading Bolsheviks who took over Russia were not Russians. They hated Russians. They hated Christians. Driven by ethnichatred they tortured and slaughtered millions of Russians without a shred of human remorse. The October Revolution was not what you call in America the “Russian Revolution.” It was an invasion and conquest over the Russian people. More of my countrymen suffered horrific crimes at their bloodstained hands than any people or nation ever suffered in the entirety of human history. It cannot be understated. Bolshevism was the greatest human slaughter of all time. The fact that most of the world is ignorant of this reality is proof that the globalmedia itself is in the hands of the perpetrators.” – Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn (1918-2008), Nobel-Prize-winning novelist, historian and victim of  Jewish Bolshevism (Marxism): https://holodomorinfo.com/


Who has heard of what is up till now the untold story of American-British Rhine Meadows death camps? Which was a deliberate policy of pure extermination of the surrendered German forces by the allies, in post-war Germany. All you usually hear about is the jews. Always the jews. But did you know that the American and British forces killed twice as many Germans after WW2 as the alleged killing of the jews?

Lets tell the truth about how the American and British with Eisenhower in the lead murdered millions of German prisoners of war AFTER they had surrendered. Many of those starving soldiers and piles of dead bodies you have seen in atrocity photos were NOT Jews, they were Germans. Russians who was first in Berlin defeating the Germans refused to take prisoners and many just fled.

In the final days of the Second World War, as the Allies advanced deep into Germany and the German Army was on the verge of defeat, the U.S. Army captured approximately 12 million German prisoners of war.

Under the direction of jewish General Dwight Eisenhower, most of these German POWs were taken to open fields in the area of the Rhine River valley in Western Germany and given no access to food, water, or shelter and simply left to die.

This was a blatant war crime and violation of international treaty requiring humane treatment of prisoners of war, and release of POWs after the cease of hostilities. The American military attempted to justify this war crime by simply re-labeling the German POWs as “disarmed enemy forces”, therefore alleging that the prisoners were still “hostile enemy forces”.

American and British soldiers mass raped, and mass murder, German people in the aftermath of World War Two. It is estimated that 5-12+ million ethnic Germans were murdered after the war. Around 5-10+ million German women were mass raped. There are no winners in any war!

Don’t make arguments about this, instead visit this page: http://www.con-tru.com/spotlight/eisenhowers-death-camps-an-untold-story-of-ww2

The Real Holocaust Victims Were the Victims of British Firebombing in World War II

VIDEO: Excerpts from a presentation by Lady Michele Renouf, speaking in Vancouver, reporting on a recent “Identitarian” conference in Mexico during which the true events of World War II were discussed in relation to understanding current affairs in modern day Europe.  She spoke of “swindle-speak” and  the historical misappropriation of terms by the media and enemies of truth, providing the term “holocaust” (a burnt whole offering) as a major example. She cited historical facts concerning the British military policy of targeting civilians in the WWII air war against Germany, and she concludes that it was the Germans who, by definition,  were the true victims of an actual “holocaust”.  She referred to Churchill’s policy, to “baste” the Germans and burn them alive. Thus, she said, “the German people should rightfully reclaim this term for themselves”. She then quoted Dennis Richards, Official Historian of the R.A.F. who admitted that the British initiated the air war, targeting civilians, in order to goad Hitler into bombing England in retaliation.

Regarding effective activism in terms of “Identitarianism”, from her own expertise in the advertising industry, she says that in order to reach the general public with the message, it is important to not use the adversary’s terminology, to not act and dress as they wish, and of not adopt archaic or nostalgic symbolism which the enemies of truth have already demonized. She urges civility and creativity in order to appeal to the wider audience with one’s message and opposes the “Neo-Nazi” look and methods.

I attended this presentation and was involved in the Q&A segment, included in this video. One should not assume, however, that I necessarily subscribe to the “Identitarian” viewpoint. My issue is and remains “Justice for Germans” with the caveat, that humanity as whole will also benefit from understanding the truth about Hitler, National Socialism and World War II.  I was, however, much impressed with her presentation. My main reason for attending was my great respect for her, in light of all of her activism on behalf of the German people and for Our Fallen over many years, and indeed, for all of humanity against our common enemy or “our predator” as she calls them.Her contention that the “Holocaust” happened to the German people echoes my own sentiments. This is also evidenced in the documentary film “Hellstorm“.

It was delightful to re-acquaint myself with her since our last meeting nearly 4 years ago. We spent several hours chatting privately after the event had concluded, and I shared with her some of what I have done in that time, including the founding of The Truth and Justice for Germans Society. She read the mandate and constitution, and she endorses it, saying “it is long overdue” and she wondered “why has it not been done before?” Other TJGS members were also in attendance and greatly appreciated her presentation: https://justice4germans.wordpress.com/

Related Info: http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Identitarianism

Lady Michele’s main website: http://tellingfilms.co.uk/


The German people have historically made great contributions in every sphere of cultural, intellectual, and scientific achievement. In the field of music, there were such eighteenth century geniuses as Bach, Hayden, Mozart, Beethoven, Shubert and Schuman, to name a few. This musical genius continued in the nineteenth century with the Strausses, Mahler and Richard Wagner. There were the literary contributions of Goethe and Schiller; the historical works of Ranke and Niebuhr; the philosophical studies of Kant and Hegel; and the great scientific contributions of Alexander von Humboldt and William Conrad Roentgen. These are only a few examples of a very long list. The Prussian system of higher education and the cultural flowering which characterized Prussia during the years following the Napoleonic wars greatly influenced both Europe and America. The American public school system as well as our university system was deliberately modeled after the Prussian public school system and university system.

Germany was admired by the world as a center of learning, for its high culture and for its achievements in every field; but also for its culture of honesty, hard work, orderliness and thrift, which existed even at the lowest level of society. British scholars and journalists had been very favorably disposed toward all things German, including their history, culture, and institutions throughout the nineteenth century. The highly respected Cambridge historian Herbert Butterfield commented extensively on Britain’s high regard for Germany: http://www.smashculturalmarxism.com/the-myth-of-germany-as-an-evil-nation/


Before the war broke out, America had welcomed German immigrants. German was the second most widely spoken language in the country and there were over 100 million first and second-generation German-Americans living in the United States. 

The United States embraced them and the German language became an established part of the high school curriculum.

But when the war broke out and Germany became the enemy of the Allies abroad, the American government began calling on its people to reject their German-American neighbors.

President Woodrow Wilson declared that German-Americans were to be treated as ‘alien-enemies’. 

More here: https://twitter.com/eurorabbit/status/920859149105328129

More here: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4992032/Germans-AMERICA-World-War.html


Concern among officials that Israel is losing the “numbers battle” against the Palestinians. Palestinians in general continue to have a higher birth rate than Israeli Jews. The Law of Return, passed in 1950, restricts immigration to Israel to those the law defines as Jewish. Currently that is anyone with a Jewish grandparent. Jamal Zahalka, an Arab member of the Israeli parliament, accused the government of seeking to further exploit a “racist, undemocratic law”.

“The Law of Return was created specifically to allow millions of Jews who have no connection to this land to immigrate and to prevent millions of Palestinian refugees and their descendants from returning to their homes,” he said.

“This law is immoral and gives immigrants more rights than the indigenous people. It needs to be cancelled, not changed so that Israel can bring more people here.”

Ilan Pappe, an Israeli historian and commentator, told MEE Israel hoped that “with proper indoctrination and incentives, non-Jews who are not Arab can be tempted to immigrate and add to the [demographic] balance sheet”.

Israel has a large number of people, often from Russia, who were Jewish enough for Ariel Sharon but not Jewish enough for the rabbis who control Jewish marriage in Israelrules: if, say, your father’s father was Jewish, you are meant to qualify for Israel’s Law of Return, but by the rabbinical law, your mother had to be Jewish.

Widening the definition of who counted as a Jew was “yet another means of de-Arabising Palestine - the other side of the ethnic cleansing and dispossession” that occurred in 1948.

Senior officials have expressed fears that comparisons with apartheid will increasingly be made if a Jewish minority is seen ruling over a Palestinian majority.

“There is an obvious problem with any state claiming to be a democracy when it has to use demography as a tool to justify keeping one community in control of another.”

Orthodox rabbis believe that only those with a Jewish mother should be classified as a Jew - a much narrower definition based on religious tradition.

Zeidan noted that most traditional Jewish communities outside Israel - in the United States, France, Germany and the UK - were thriving and had shown little interest in moving to Israel.

Earlier this year, Netanyahu urged Jews in Europe to move to Israel, claiming it was the only safe place for them. 

Organisations have been lobbying for many years for recognition of “lost tribes,” as well as what are termed “beit anusim,”  people whose ancestors were forced to convert to Christianity during the Spanish and Portuguese inquisitions.

Underlining that agenda of groups like Shavei Israel, many of the new immigrants have been housed in illegal settlements in the West Bank. The latest group of nearly 80 Bnei Menashe were sent to communities in the Golan, Syrian territory Israel has illegally annexed since 1967.

Zahalka pointed out that Israel’s immigration minister, Zeev Elkin, who was photographed welcoming the new arrivals, is a settler and has publicly supported annexing all of the West Bank.

“wants to widen the definition of who is a Jew so can move many of these new immigrants into the settlements,” he said.

“Its goal is a Zionist, one-state solution that forces Palestinians into enclaves, confiscates their land and then pases it on to Jews. To achieve their goal they need to bring more people here to justify stealing yet more land from the Palestinians.”

According to the Israeli media, there are signs the government may be skewing the committee’s makeup to ensure its decision favours reforming the Law of Return.

Shlomo Sand, a historian at Tel Aviv University, documents in his 2009 book The Invention of the Jewish People two decades of contradictory findings in genetic research. He concludes: “After all the costly ‘scientific’ endeavours, a Jewish individual cannot be defined by any biological criteria whatsoever.”

That view was supported in 2013 by Eran Elhaik, an Israeli geneticist at John Hopkins School of Public Health in Baltimore, after he examined much of the recent research looking for a Jewish gene.

In an interview with the Haaretz newspaper, he argued that the researchers’ “results were written before they began the research. First they shot their arrow - and then they painted the bull’s-eye around it.”

Rabbinical authorities in Israel have refused to recognise as Jews some 350,000 of the one million immigrants who came to Israel in the 1990s following the collapse of the Soviet Union.

That has left these immigrants in social limbo because the rabbis exclusively control personal status matters for the Jewish population, including marriage, divorce and burial. Many have been forced to marry abroad to get round the restrictions: http://www.middleeasteye.net/news/israel-hopes-lost-tribes-can-boost-jewish-numbers-1923523277


Today, Middle America is caught between the vice grips of plutocracy and crazy leftist policies. The two major parties offer us a choice between lukewarm neoconservatism and cultural marxist influenced liberalism, and neither cares about the common people. There’s plenty of blame to go around, though it’s well-documented here that a disproportionate amount of it is from the influence of Jewish elites. The details are indelicate but unmistakable.

Still, there’s a great difference between ordinary Jews and their elites. Most of the former are decent people, and most of the latter deserve to be deported and in many cases should be in prison for financial chicanery or treason. Do the policies of their elites really benefit the common Members of the Tribe? Since “Is it good for the Jews?” is the primary consideration, let’s see how well it’s been working out so far. First we’ll explore in a fictional example how that might work out for one of them.

David’s story

1979: David enters college, with ambitions to be a doctor. He also wants to start a large family some day. He soon finds thatradical feminism is all the rage on campus. That began with the Second Wave harpies; a movement that just doesn’t know when to shut up. Thus, unpleasant attitudes are common. He supports feminism too – that’s just about equality, right? After David is shot down hard repeatedly, it leaves him terrified of asking anyone out. Eventually he gives up trying to find a girlfriend, reasoning that he’ll have more time to hit the books.

1990: Now a full-fledged doctor, he anticipates a pretty good cash flow. He looks for a house, but finds out there’s no way in hell he can afford one in Los Angeles, especially with the Federal Reserve’s prime rate at 10%. At least it’s not 20% like ten years ago! He gets an apartment in Watts instead. Being a socially conscious liberal, he considers it his life’s work to serve the underprivileged, and at least here he can be near his clientele. He figures he’ll fit right in; after all, as Franz Boas and Ashley Montagu revealed, race is only a social construct, right?

1991: Getting into business was more difficult than he expected. David still struggles with red tape, something with which he has little experience. Figuring out how to make a small business work turned out to be a daunting task. Although the government gives many advantages to big businesses, there’s not much to help a little guy starting out. Further, he’s paying off a whale of a student loan, as well as an exorbitant premium for malpractice insurance. He’s a very careful doctor, but malpractice insurance is a necessity because of all the bottom-feeder lawyers and their clients looking to win the lottery in court. He has to get credit cards to stay afloat, and soon he’s barely able to afford minimum payments. He begins to loathe bankers. He wonders, “If banking is supposedly a Jewish institution, like those anti-Semites say, then why am I getting screwed?”

1992: After a few years in practice, David is breaking even, but still barely chipping away at his millstone of debt. One burglary and two muggings later, he’s getting just a bit sick of Watts. He hadn’t fit in as easily as expected, getting angry glares frequently. A couple times he asks, are they aware of how much the Jews did for them in the civil rights movement? That gets a pretty bad reaction! Then in April, the LA riots erupt. After cowering in his apartment watching the mayhem on TV, he finds that his doctor’s office was torched, just like all the Korean shopkeepers. He takes the hint and moves.

2000: David is now doing quite well in plastic surgery. His credit cards are paid off – still a very bitter experience for him – and his student loan is way down. In He invests money in some hot new tech stocks that his broker says are soaring. Soon after, they plummet. His broker encourages him to hang on; surely they’ll recover. They do somewhat, then fall even lower. At the end of the year, he cashes out, incurring a huge loss.

2001: After the September 11 attacks, David wonders, “Why do they hate us?” He recalls the words of his grandfather, who had scared the daylights out of him with stories about their people’s past persecutions. He was told that Gentiles are irrational that way; it’s just what they do. David, having received no ill-treatment from his peers thus far, thought his grandfather was a bit behind the times. However, the terrorist attacks make David wonder if perhaps the old man was right. In response, he starts donating heavily to a group combating “hate”.

2002: David once again considers starting a family. Finally he’s financially secure, so why not? One of his brothers married a Salvadoran, and the other a Filipina; they have agreeable personalities because they grew up in countries not polluted by feminism. He asked his brothers why carrying on their heritage isn’t important. One laughed and said, “Aren’t you supposed to be this big liberal?” The other one told him flat-out that in the 21st Century, ethnicity doesn’t matter. Besides, everyone will mix together and look the same one day, and that’s “progress”,right? His objection — “But we’re different!” — falls on deaf ears. In any case, David hasn’t had much luck so far in the dating arena. He thought being a doctor would make him a great catch; it turns out that isn’t the case! This is especially so in Los Angeles, where Hollywood celebrity-worship made everyone want to land a movie star.

2004: Finally David gets a steady girlfriend, sharing his religion — maybe this could be the real thing! Destiny intervenes when she gets pregnant. He’s ecstatic, but she wants to get an abortion — “But what about my career?” As a doctor, he’s heard plenty about what that really involves. It’s very hard to break through her feminist programming, but he talks her away from the brink. To the delight of their parents, they get married. When she looks into her son’s eyes for the first time, she knows she made the right decision not to kill him. He will be their only child; the pursuit of career fueled by consumerism robbed her of her most fertile years. As for now, David decides he’ll need to invest for his family’s future. His new broker turns him onto the next big thing: mortgage backed securities. These were made possible by the repeal of post-Depression measures separating investment banking from commercial banking.

2007: David operates on a veteran injured in Iraq, his face scarred by an IED. Afterward, he angrily fumes about Bush the Younger’s military adventures, all to get cheap oil. On the way home, he fills his gas tank — “What, it’s almost five bucks a gallon now?” At home, he reads the paper, noticing an op-ed by a Washington neocon, arguing that America should invade Iran and Syria too. Something just doesn’t seem right about the whole narrative, but he can’t quite put his finger on it…

2008: Once again, David loses his shirt as his top-quality investments plummet. His business declines as everyone is cutting their expenses. He tries to get a bank loan, but they turn him down. Pressured by the Clinton administration and by lawsuits from “community organizers”, the bankers had been giving loans to anyone with a pulse; but all that changed. David has to go back into credit card debt to make ends meet, though he’d prefer to chew his liver out. So much for any hopes of early retirement… “G­­-d damn Republicans! I’m going to campaign for Obama!” Meanwhile, Wall Street billionaires lobby for a huge government bailout; they’re “too big to fail”. He hears some nasty anti-Semitic talk about Wall Street being a big Jewish casino. He mutters, “They’re wrong; what the hell good did it do for me?”

2012: David’s eight year old son announces that he wants to try being a girl. David doesn’t care to have his kid become a eunuch, or his future hope for grandchildren to be washed down the drain of some bathhouse. So he has to carefully explain to his son that he’s what nature made him to be. He has a talk with the school administrators, getting quite an education himself about what they’ve been teaching. “Look, I’m liberal too, but this is going too far.” They tell him to stop being so intolerant. Later, he reads news about a new Section 8 housing project in the neighborhood. He has mixed feelings about that one.

2013: Things aren’t going so well. David’s son is getting hassled by newly-arrived Muslim immigrant kids at school. When he finally fights back, the school administrators punish him and threaten to expel him if he defends himself again. Further, ever since the Section 8 development came in, the neighborhood has been declining. Business is doing better again, but moving to a gated community is far out of his price range. When the car is in the shop, David takes public transit. Fully immersed in the vibrancy of Los Angeles, he reflects that California doesn’t look much like it did when he grew up. He always considered diversity a good thing, but how much is too much? The way things are going, any grandchildren he might have will be living in a Third World country.

2014: David is accosted by half a dozen members of a Black agitation group. He pleads, “But I voted for Obama twice, and even campaigned for him. We should be friends. I’m not like those other White people, I’m….” They attack, and ironically, he ends up in the same hospital where he did his internship.

David’s enlightenment

When he gets home, he researches this agitation group, and finds out who’s been funding it and dozens of other front groups. The truth is horrifying. He keeps researching, and can’t stop even though he really doesn’t like what he finds. He discovers the prominent Jewish role in several catastrophic trends. He even learns that the “watchdog” group he contributed to for years is a scam, run by a degenerate.

Then one of his old friends from high school comes back to town, a long-distance truck driver with a family of four children in Utah. They go out to a bar and catch up. Eventually the discussion turns to politics. David considered his friend to have dreadfully provincial views, but perhaps this goyisches Kopfwas on the right track about a few things. Loosened up by several beers, David discusses what he’s recently discovered.

His friend replies, “I already know about all that. Word gets around; a lot more than you might suspect. I haven’t mentioned it before because I didn’t want to hurt your feelings. If all they wanted to do was make money, I could understand it, but they really need to knock it off with the social engineering. People are getting angry about it, and I’m afraid it might get worse the longer this sort of thing goes on. They’re giving your community a very bad reputation.”

“Here’s what I don’t get. They were doing this all for people like me? A hell of a lot of good I got out of all that! They’ve been wrecking everything, even though America was the best home we ever had. What the hell were they thinking?”

“Welcome to my world.”

“What do you mean by that?”

“All those Jewish big shots you mentioned don’t really give a damn about you. My own politicians and big business figures aren’t working for my best interests either. Do you really think the Clintons, for example, care about people like me? And how about Obama? This ‘Lightworker’ was sold to the public as some big Messiah who was going to heal the country, but are his own people prosperous and happy now? Did Ted Kennedy care about my family’s future? I certainly don’t give him a free pass for being Irish like me; think about that one carefully. The greater question, though, is what we’re going to do to save the society that both of us live in.”

If this was a survival strategy, it completely backfired. More here: http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2017/04/are-policies-by-jewish-elites-really-good-for-the-jews/


Many White Nationalists who rightfully embrace the collective racial identity of the white race tend to dismiss today’s America as an outdated and useless idea, a mere political entity bound together by inimical and artificial laws that totally disregard or marginalize whites, which I sincerely agree and sympathize with. These same people may think that it doesn’t really matter if a surging China is about to displace the position of the US in today’s world since they do not identify with the corrupt and decadent state that it is today. I fully understand this rationale, but feel it vitally necessary to point out that China, as an alien and fiendish power whose many character traits bear a striking semblance to those of Jewry, never distinguishes between the whites of various national groups, whether it be the US, the UK, France, Germany, Australia, Russia, and so on. For the Chinese, the US and white Americans are one and the same concept, just as are the UK and white Britons, Russia and white Russians, and so on. They are all whites and objects to be conquered in China’s quest for global dominance, in their eyes. When China thinks about defeating and subjugating America or Australia or Russia, they are thinking about defeating and destroying the white racial stock of those countries. Since the US is currently still nominally the most powerful country, China targets the US, and specifically its white population, as its main enemy. Therefore, even if White Nationalists in the US feel no allegiance to it as a polity, they are essentially the same thing in the eyes of the Chinese as potential adversaries to be subdued or eliminated. Hence, even if you have chosen to forfeit your love for the US in your heart, you still have an obligation to resist and foil the Chinese plan to dislodge and decapitate America simply for the sake of defending the interests of the white race: her sovereignty, dignity, and ultimate survival.

To do that, the ideal and only effective way other than an all-out war with China is absolute, total, thorough, inexorable, and irrevocable disengagement with China. The illusion of transforming China through active economic and cultural engagement, as was promoted by US political and economic elites and practiced by its presidents from Nixon to Trump to varying degrees, has already proved an utter failure by ironclad facts that amply demonstrate the self-deluding and self-defeating nature of such a policy. China today is not only conducting blatant industrial and military espionage activities in the US and other Western countries, it’s also actively buying off the resources of the Western nations and using its increasing financial clout to silence voices of criticism and dissent, besides exporting its Fifth Column to the West through immigration as a potential Trojan Horse. The pieces of evidence for this are simply too large to count. We are talking about a people whose collective culture tells them to feel no qualms about lying, cheating, and stealing in order to get to the top. The West has engaged China only to continuously feed and fatten a tiger of an insatiable, bestial appetite until the moment it pounces on its feeder and devours him. Trade with China must be ended, all transportation to and from China in the form of people and goods must be ended, all capital and technological investments in both directions must be ended, and all academic communications must be ended, so that the poisonous tentacles sucking blood and nutrients from the body and spreading disease and vice to the mind of the white race will be cut off once and for all.

And if whites intend to safeguard their homes from the Chinese peril, we must first topple the rule of the established elites, Jews and gentile traitors alike, who have opened the gates to the Chinese flood and who continue to encourage it. The globalist, consumerist, nihilistic, and hedonistic ideology must be debunked, delegitimized, and demolished on the public stage. To accomplish this critically important mission of reclaiming our own fate and tuning back the tide, we need to educate and awaken our people, muster their collective strength to fight, and train a tough, reliable, and resourceful elite force of our own to lead and inspire. That’s where the value and significance of the work of Counter-Currents lies: https://www.counter-currents.com/2017/08/chinas-sinister-strategy-for-global-dominance/


Most Americans view the Indian historical record of resistance to European colonisation as morally justifiable, but in the skewed ethics of today, some find European-American attempts to preserve our unique genes and culture from non-European immigration – morally reprehensible. Nevertheless, despite pervasive propaganda promoting multiculturalism and the media-touted joys of diversity, opinion surveys in America show overwhelming opposition to unrestricted immigration. Similar public sentiment holds true in every European nation.

It was not until the 1965 Immigration Act that the U.S. Congress ignored the majority’s wishes and began a policy that discriminated against potential European immigrants, and encouraged massive non-European immigration. From that time forward, the federal government also showed less willingness to enforce our immigration laws and police our borders. These policies resulted in a flood of non-White immigrants, legal and illegal. Immigration and higher non-White birthrates have transformed the American population from almost 90 percent European in the early 1960s to less than 70 percent at the end of the century. The U.S. Census Bureau has predicted that by the middle of the 21st century, well within the lifetime of many reading these words, European Americans will be a minority in the United States. We are already a minority in most of America’s major cities and will soon be outnumbered in California and Texas. Policies similar to those enacted in the U.S. have introduced large numbers of non-Europeans into Canada; Negroes into Britain; North Africans and Asians into France; Turks into Germany; and a potpourri of alien races into Scandinavia, Spain, and Italy.

As I grew racially aware, it was certainly obvious to me that the new immigration policies of the United States and Europe would greatly damage Western societies. Only a short time after the change in immigration policy, crime problems escalated in all the affected nations. The quality of education suffered and social welfare problems increased. As this planned racial transformation accelerates, these ills will reach catastrophic proportions: http://davidduke.com/my-awakening-chapter-24-the-jewish-role-in-immigration/


The precursor to the ongoing covert hybrid WW3 has its colourful beginnings in the Kingdom of Khazaria, a Turkic empire which had its epicenter center in what is now known as Ukraine.

Khazaria was ruled by an evil king, who had practiced Babylonian black arts, with the occult oligarchy serving as his court.

Khazarians become known to surrounding countries as thieves, murderers, road bandits, and for assuming the identities of those travelers they murdered as a normal occupational practice and way of life.


The leaders of the surrounding nations, especially Russia, have had so many years of complaints by their citizens that, as a group, they deliver an ultimatum to the Khazarian king. They send a communique to the Khazarian king that he must choose one of the three Abrahamic religions for his people, and make it his official state religion and require all Khazarian citizens to practice it, and socialise all Khazarian children to practice that faith.

The Khazarian king was given a choice between Islam, Christianity and Judaism. The Khazarian king chose Judaism, and promised to stay within the requirements laid out by the surrounding confederacy of nations led by the Russian czar. Despite his agreement and promise, the Khazarian king and his inner circle of oligarchs kept practicing ancient Babylonian black-magic, also known as Secret Satanism. This Secret Satanism involved occult ceremonies featuring child sacrifice, after “bleeding them out”, drinking their blood and eating their hearts.


As opposed to most peoples today, the remnants of Khazaria don’t let bygones be bygones. They have been preparing for the big war. They have been infiltrating all of the institutions of the world.

The deep dark secret of the occult ceremonies was that they were all based on ancient Baal Worship, also known as worship of the Owl. In order to fool the confederacy of nations led by Russia that were watching Khazaria, the Khazarian king melded these Luciferian black-magick practices with Judaism and created a secret Satanic-hybrid religion, known as Babylonian Talmudism. This was made the national religion of Khazaria, and nurtured the same evil that Khazaria was known for before.

Sadly, the Khazarians continued their evil ways, robbing and murdering those from surrounding countries who traveled through Khazaria. Khazarian robbers often attempted to assume their identities after they murdered these visitors, and became masters of disguises and false identities — a practice they have continued even to this very day, along with their child-sacrifice occult ceremonies, which are actually ancient Baal Worship.


Today, they are everywhere, and Russia’s battle is ours, too. https://geopolitics.co/2017/03/01/covert-war-between-russia-and-khazarian-jewry/

QUEEN OF DHIMMIS, EMPRESS OF THE ANTI-EMPIRE, DEFENDER OF THE ISLAMIC FAITH, HEAD OF THE SURRENDER OF ENGLAND: I’ve been saying for years that when push comes to shove in the confrontation between the West and the Muslims in the West, the liberal elite will surrender to Islam. I was too optimistic. Push hasn’t even come to shove yet, and already the Queen of England has spectacularly submitted. Symbolically and in principle, the worst has already happened. All that is left is the practical unfolding of its implications. Which doesn’t mean that we surrender. It’s the liberal elite that have surrendered, and we must resist them to the death. My question about the Queen wearing Islamic dress is, when did she start doing this? I found out that she was, apparently, the first British monarch to visit the Middle East when she did so in 1979. Pictures from that visit show her wearing normal Western attire—gloves and a hat—as well as what I think is customary royal garb. I also learned that this current visit is apparently the first visit in which she visited a mosque, raising the question of why such a visit was necessary this time when it wasn’t necessary on previous visits.

I think the answer is that the British royal famly has made a conscious decision to facilitate the Islamization of the West.

Since I support the British monarchy, this raises the question, not of ending the monarchy, but of removing the Windsor dynasty and replacing it. I wonder if there any qualified descendants of Victoria, Edward VII, or George V who are not hopeless liberal decadents like the Windsors and who could be raised to the throne, just as, when the Tudor line ran out, the English went back to a descendant of the first Tudor king Henry VII, James I of Scotland, and that was the beginning of the Stuart line; and just as, when the Stuart line ran out, they went back to a descendant of the first Stuart king James I, George of Hanover, and made him king. The Windsor line hasn’t run out, but it has become destructive and dangerous to the survival of England, and therefore must go.

I hate referrinng to the famously staunch and stolid Elizabeth as a “hopeless liberal decadent,” but her kow-towing to Islam is a deal killer as far as I’m concerned.

Is there anyone in England who feels the same? Or is it only a handful of right-wing Americans who actually care whether England lives or dies? : http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/018065.html


Muslims invented Islamophobia to turn the tables around on innocent Westerners legitimately concerned about Islam’s invasion of the West with all the above mentioned “customs” and “traditions.”

As Muslims chase and hunt Christians in Muslim countries and in the West, no one dares raise their voice to confront them with those attacks on Christianity.

A nascent and nasty Christophobia is latent in the midst of Muslims.

Yet, when Christian parents refuse their children to be indoctrinated  in Islam or any other religion, for that matter, now the Church of England is pointing “towards far right political groups and some minority faith sects as activists who are trying to ‘exploit’ the legal right of parents to withdraw their children from school RE.”

The Surrender of the Church of England? 

The situation is so surreal that the extreme globalizing Church of England has called for the right of withdrawal to be repealed and for RE to become a compulsory part of school timetables to encourage pupils to learn to live with others from different backgrounds.”

But, learning to live with others is just that.  It does not imply becoming erudite in others’ religions.

That said, parents have a legal right to remove their children from religious education under a 1998 education law.

It is precisely that law that the Church of England would like to have repealed, so Christian children are indoctrinated in the “religion of peace,” Islam.

Parents that remove their children from those Islamic religious classes are considered fundamentalists.

The Church of England school inspection chief Derek Holloway saidin this respect:

‘To enable all to live well together there is a need for all pupils from all backgrounds to receive a broad and balanced curriculum that includes high-quality RE.

‘Sadly, and dangerously the right of withdrawal from RE is now being exploited by a range of interest groups often using a dubious interpretation of human rights legislation. The right of withdrawal from RE now gives comfort to those who are breaking the law and seeking to incite religious hatred.’

Then Mr. Holloway affirmed that “To enable all to live well together there is a need for all pupils from all backgrounds to receive a broad and balanced curriculum that includes high-quality religious education.”

The Final Stage is Conversion to Islam

As most of the world knows, the goal of Islam as dictated by Mohammed in their Koran is to conquer the West, subjugate the dhimmis or non-Muslims, force-convert them if necessary.

If the dhimmis do not accept being converts to Islam, the Koran gives precise instructions to murder the infidels by any means, including beheading.

Those who convert are condemned to lifelong taxes.


The Supreme Governor of the Church of England is Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II.

Although the “polity” is in charge of the Episcopal, England’s Primate is Justin Welby, the Archbishop of Canterbury.

The Church of England has 4,700 schools including 200 secondary schools.

What’s most worrisome is that the Church declared aim is to promote ‘deep respect for the integrity of other traditions’ in religious education (RE.)

Islam will rule sovereign over all Britain, heads will roll, women will be raped, children will be brainwashed and abused, and they keep their word.  They have for hundreds of years.



It is an irony that two institutions that once valiantly defended the West are now complicit in its betrayal. For 1,000 years the royal houses of Europe and the Catholic Church worked together to defend Europe against Islam and to free the Holy Land. The church, with at least a billion followers worldwide, is still one of the most powerful institutions on earth, and European monarchs still have prestige and influence. Neither group takes serious steps to prevent Europe’s demographic nightmare.

In Belgium, for example, the royal family is widely respected, and it is common for the monarch to speak on days of national importance. Last year, King Albert II gave a Christmas speech on live television, in which he warned against “populism” and referred pointedly to the “catastrophic consequences of the 1930s.” This was a clear attack on the New Flemish Alliance, a political party that wants tighter immigration control and aims to break Flanders away from Belgium to establish a self-consciously Flemish state. It is unusual for a monarch to talk politics, but it is typical that Albert chose a capitulationist theme.

Queen Beatrix of the Netherlands likewise gave a Christmas speech, in which she said that throughout history Holland had been a tolerant country, and that multiculturalism and immigration made it strong. She forgot to mention that it was European immigration that made the country strong, and that non-white immigration started only in the 1960s.

In 2008, on his 60th birthday, Prince Charles of England announced plans to change one of the titles of the British monarch from “defender of the faith” to “defender of faith.” Ever since Henry VIII, the throne has defended the Christian faith, whether Catholic or Church of England. Charles thinks that is too exclusive, and wants to defend all faiths, including that of jihadists who want to conquer Europe. As early as 1986, he was calling for black faces in the elite military units that attend ceremonial events.

There is an occasional exception. In 2005, Queen Margrethe stated that the Denmark must take the challenge of Islam seriously, and that her country had been too lax and tolerant. She was clearly aware of the danger of candor: “We have to run the risk of being labeled in an unflattering way, because there are some things for which we should display no tolerance.”

As for the Catholic Church, most of the hierarchy appears to have no loyalty to Europe. In 1990, before his elevation to pope, Cardinal Ratzinger at a private dinner party reportedly lamented “the slow suicide of Europe” as its population aged and was being replaced by inassimilable immigrants. Once he was pope and speaking in public, however, he denounced the “fear of others, of foreigners,” who “reach our land and appear to threaten what we are.” He said this in Venice in 2011, at a time when North Africans were swarming into southern Italy because of upheaval in Egypt, Tunisia, and Libya.

Today, the number of Catholics is declining in Europe while it grows in Africa and Latin America. After Pope Benedict’s resignation this year there was much talk of a possible non-white pope who would reflect the changing face of Catholicism. Such a church is not going to fight to keep Europe European.

The EU, of course, is not a friend to whites. The union’s person in charge of immigration and asylum is Cecilia Mallström, an unabashed leftist from Sweden who is never happier than when welcoming more non-whites into Europe.

At the same time, the EU has its very own $15 billion-a-year foreign aid program. Every year, it gives $750 million of its citizens’ money to . . . Turkey! It has also sent a troupe of Belgians to one of the most down-and-out countries in Africa, Burkina Faso, to teach them how to dance. The EU has even given $13 million to an immigration-advisory office in Mali that is supposed to help Africans find jobs in Europe.https://www.amren.com/features/2013/04/unruly-europe-part-i/


We thus have a combination of forces that make this a very difficult and complex time for Europeans. In general, Europe has lost any awareness of the need to survive as a homeland for whites. Europeans have a supranational government that wants immigrant-friendly uniformity, and national governments that, for the most part, also promote immigration. Europeans face a low birth rate and are seeing their country—especially their great cities—transformed by prolific non-white immigrants.

Southern Europe, especially, suffers from a terrible economic crisis. This has demoralized Spaniards and prompted many to leave their homeland, but in Greece, it has stiffened the will to survive. All over Europe, we see the slow but unmistakable rise of “far-right” parties that stand, if not in so many words, for a Europe for Europeans. These parties can only increase in influence as they gain respectability, power, and experience, and as the savage consequences of dispossession become ever clearer.

But they will have to work hard. As Guillaume Faye has written, “If the generation of native Europeans that turned 20 between 2000 and 2010 doesn’t act, everything will be lost—forever.” More here: https://www.amren.com/features/2013/04/unruly-europe-part-two/


The white race has always faced the possibility of extinction. Throughout history many race wars have been fought. Europe was in constant threat of invasions from enemies that surrounded it. Whether it was the Persians, Muslim moors, or the Huns, or the mongols, the Tartars, or the Turks. Wars were waged, Lands were lost, thousands were abducted and enslaved, sold as hard labour, or as sex slaves, or as child soldiers. Despite minimal communications, poor sanitation, lower life expectancy, Europe always fought off its foes. But now, I fear for the worst. Not only are Europe’s colonial nations becoming melting pots and losing their true identity. Even Mother Europe is becoming a melting pot, becoming consumed by a foreign invasion. The sons and daughters of Europe are now tolerant of people who have little tolerance of them. Every white nation is expected to be tolerant, and become a melting pot. While this is being imposed on us, it is not an expectation of African, or Asian nations to give up their identity, to become tolerant and to mix until there is nothing left. There is a reason for this. Whites are civilization builders. 

We are creators, we are conquerors. Just as we can build something out of nothing, make it great and awe inspiring, so can we tear down rot and corruption, we can expose the filth. We are the only ones capable of hanging the tyrants. The tyrants, those global capitalists, those bankers. They want a serf population, they want dumb workers who do as they’re told, fools who toil day in and day out for somebody elses money, working for somebody elses dream. They fear white people with goals, true goals that affirm the future of our bloodlines. So they distract the people with frivolities and nonsense, they shame our past and flood our countries with aliens. They do this to prevent us from taking control of our own fate. They use every tool at there disposal whether it’s the media, police, or government branches to shut down anyone who see’s through the wool. They create speech laws to prevent people from telling inconvenient truths and possibly opening eyes. We don’t have self-determination, we are repressed, culturally and spiritually. Our nations are not ours anymore: http://vinlandawakes.blogspot.com.au/2015/03/if-you-are-reading-this-because-you.html?m=1 


Abraham Lincoln must have been God, because he is supposed to have performed trans-substantivity.

In a speech far shorter than a Mass, the God Lincoln transformed our Declaration of Independence into a statement that we ruled the world.

Let us see if anybody remembers what the word “independence” means.

Independence means we are dedicated to one thing, and the one thing is that you don’t run our affairs and we don’t run yours.

Lincoln declared that the Declaration gave us the power to force our version of equality anywhere on earth.  General Wesley Clark declared that American troops should be used whenever we feel like it to enforce racial quotas in Europe.

People say Lincoln was God and Clark his Prophet.

I think they should have been committed.

The Founding Fathers knew exactly what “independence” meant and they stated it: “To maintain the Blessing of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity.”

No congress today would allow such a statement even to be proposed for the Constitution.

It is Nativist and Evil and God will get you for it.

The actual Constitution says not one word about jamming equality down throats around the world.

The Preamble to the real Constitution is that we should have no immigrants unless their presence is good for the people already here.

No one who thinks Lincoln is God will know any real history. So they think there were a lot of immigrants who helped adopt the Constitution.

Actually, the generation that adopted the Constitution had the highest percentage of native born white Americans it has ever had before or since. It is not incidental that the President had to be born here: ://www.robertwwhitaker.com/foreign-policy/if-your-heart-is-in-israel-your-butt-should-be-in-israel/


This is a war unlike any other war in history.  It is taking place silently and surreptitiously under the very noses of its victims.  Roughly 95-99 per cent of the victims of this war, scattered over several continents in the traditional White homelands of the European people, remain blissfully unaware that they are about to be dispossessed and genocided. Some of them, like lambs being led to the slaughterhouse, have now begun to bleat and give signs of incipient alarm. In the videos below, you will hear the first sounds of this unhappy bleating . . .  WATCH here: https://www.darkmoon.me/2016/project-white-genocide-world-war-three-has-already-begun-3-videos-10-mins/


Because throughout the ages, war, plague, famine and every kind of bad fortune you could imagine ravaged your ancestors. So many people died, while your ancestors survived, left their mark on the world, and passed down their genes over and over again until eventually you were born. Every generation before you contributed to our existence in one form or another. Great things were built, lands were explored and settled, invaders were fought off. Everything was done to secure a future for us. It’s awfully selfish to turn your back on the efforts of your ancestors, it’s even worse to make no attempt at making a better world for future generations, because considering everything we’ve accomplished in the past, our future is beyond all comprehension. Our future is in all of our hands: http://vinlandawakes.blogspot.com.au/2015/03/if-you-are-reading-this-because-you.html?m=1


Racial Nationalism is an ideology that advocates love of one’s Race with love of one’s nation and which advocates the self-determination of all Races. Racial Nationalism is pro true human diversity as nature created and intended it to be. Racial Nationalism is the protector of diversity, it is natures ideology.

Anti-Racist Internationalism (globalism) with its roots in International Socialism (Communism), and what is known today as Cultural Marxism, is what can truly be called an anti-diversity and racist ideology. It seeks to eradicate what nature has created over many thousands of years. Advocates of ‘anti-racism’ are in fact multiracialists, who campaign for and support the mass importation of the worlds majority races into the homelands of the worlds true #racial minority, the White European via Mass Immigration.

This is an ideological worldview that seeks to destroy the racial and cultural homogeneity of the White European people and is an ideology based on an illogical hatred of White Europeans. Anti-Racism is psychological warfare against White Europeans as it uses Whites to work against their own interests, this is done through the Marxist indoctrination system known as academia which distorts history and biological realities to serve the overall agenda of destroying White European homogeneity.

Anti-Racism denies true diversity by pushing the false and poisonous Boasian idea that ‘race does not exist.’ This denies the biological reality of what nature created and denies the unique differences of all people who live on the planet: https://smashculturalmarxism.wordpress.com/page/16/

White Nationalism is Not Anti-Semitism

“White nationalism” is a much abused term.

Its defining tenet holds that European-Americans need their own ethnostate to prevent their destruction by the anti-white forces controlling the political and social systems of the United States and that such an ethnostate is the necessary precondition for re-asserting America’s European destiny.It is thus not an aspiration for racial supremacy or segregation, not a form of racial hatred or eugenic social engineering, but rather a movement of thought, akin to historic nationalism, which champions the New World’s “white nation.”

Relatedly, white nationalism has an important anti-Jewish facet because Organized Jewry is a powerful (some claim the most powerful) force compelling the present ethnocidal assault on European America.

This anti-Jewish or anti-Semitic facet, however, is but one aspect of white nationalism. The struggle — with ideas today, in the streets tomorrow, through force of arms in the end — to establish a European ethnostate in North America entails, by definition, resisting not just the alien forces threatening white life, but, more important, consciously affirming and asserting America’s European destiny.

As a critique of alien cultural distortion, anti-Semitism, then, may be a necessary part of the larger “national” struggle — but it is neither the aim of that struggle nor its essence.

A great many of those associated with white nationalism, however, not just fixate on the “inner enemy” to the exclusion of everything else, they tend to define their project in terms of the “Semitism” they oppose. The result, I contend, distorts or side-tracks white nationalism’s higher purpose.

* * *

If anti-Semitism is the natural “anti-body” that America’s cultural organism produces to defend itself, then to see white nationalism solely in its terms is to think that it is the opposite of the “body” it resists. This makes the “Aryan” the negative of the Jew, for anti-Semites assume not just a certain symmetry with their Semitic enemy, they inadvertently turn white nationalism into a sort of inverse Semitism

More specifically, a Judeo-centric white nationalism promotes a strictly nullifying orientation in so far as it seeks to overthrow Jewish supremacy not on the basis of anything positive or native, but solely because of its destructive – “parasitic” – impact on white life. This negative orientation is supportable, though, only as long as its costs are ignored, for it leaves whites totally unconscious of what they are fighting for and, when exaggerated, fosters pathologies of another kind.

A critique of Jewish power that serves white interest would inevitably go beyond negativity to stress the informing and transcendent values which Jewish interests (among other contending forces) threaten.

Judeo-centric white nationalism, however, rarely attains such levels and, as a dogma oblivious to every differing view, usually ends up discrediting the nationalist cause.

As such, this dogma knows the answer to every question before it is even posed – for every failing and misfortune we suffer is automatically assumed to be the fault of the Omnipotent Jew. No need, then, for laborious studies in history, culture, and political-social analysis – just “name the Jew” and everything is explainable.

So positioned, it can’t see that Jewish power is aided, abetted, and made possible by the very principles undergirding America’s liberal order — that Jewish power involves “Aryan” compliance, and that this compliance, routinely venerated in America’s Low Church worship of Mammon, emphasizes quantifying factors indifferent not just to a man’s qualities, but to the “rights” of blood and spirit.

Worse, an inordinate number of Judeo-centric white nationalists tend to share the same antipathy to Europe (our Fatherland) as do the Jews and consider materialism, egoism, and democratic corruption, inherent to America’s liberal project, as something uniquely Jewish, and not, as the most cursory examination of the historical record shows, an organic offshoot of the liberal system created by Americans of European Christian (mainly Calvinist) extraction.

For this reason, I often wonder if obsessing about Jews doesn’t cause certain culture-distortions in those so involved and that the white nationalism of these obsessives neglects, as a consequence, all that is positive and life-affirming in our own project — naively assuming, as they do, that a solution to the Jewish problem is all it will take to ensure a future for white children in North America.

Totally oblivious, then, to the fact that America’s shallow, latently anti-European culture favors Jewish methods and Jewish concerns, these blinkered anti-Semites prefer to indulge in fairy tales about “cultural Marxism” and the Frankfurter bogey man – unconscious of or uninterested in the larger subversion.

Knowing only their caricature of the inner enemy, they also either ignore the outer enemy (the colored world), treat it as a friend, or consider it a mere adversary. The West’s 1400-year conflict with Islam and its various conflictual relations with the non-white world are thereby reduced to Jewish machinations, dismissed, in effect, as an actual danger to Europe’s destiny and to the True America born of Europe.

This unbalanced, all-consuming Judeo-centric white nationalism is above all politically timid, emphasizing Jewish machinations, but neglecting the ways in which the American project itself betrays our European destiny. It thus conveniently ignores the revolutionary changes that whites will need to make, in themselves and in the larger order, if they are ever to throw off the alien, anti-white forces governing the United States and resume their European destiny. In this sense, Judeo-centric white nationalism is just another variant of the prevailing country-club conservatism.

In sum, Jew-obsessed nationalism:

  •  is purely negative and potentially distorting;
  • fosters a Manichaeism that neglects every other factor responsible for white dispossession;
  • ignores that the culture of critique and other anti-white stratagems are inherent to America’s modern liberal order;
  • neglects the outer enemy;
  • threatens to turn white nationalism into an inverse Semitism;
  • and, in the last instance, has no real idea of what white nationalists are fighting for: https://www.counter-currents.com/2011/10/white-nationalism-is-not-anti-semitism/


On Radio Derb recently I have been promoting a theme of “academic nationalism.” Higher education, I have argued, is a precious resource; and   our own citizens should have first call on it.

As I observed in the February 17th podcast:

It’s not as if the universities who admit all these foreign students are doing it from high morality and a sincere desire to improve the world. They’re doing it for money: foreign students pay full tuition. It’s not an open-hearted spirit of national generosity: it’s a cash racket.

So there’s another action point on immigration for you, Mr President: a ceiling on student visas. And here’s a slogan to go with it: “American schools for American citizens!”

I enlarged on this theme March 17th, commenting on an article in The Economist’s bimonthly supplement about Chinese students at the University of Iowa:

The Chinese students are so numerous now, they feel no need to engage with local Americans, they just hang out with each other. The rich ones are very rich, way richer than the rubes of Iowa City, and they flaunt it. Cheating is epidemic, with a whole industry in China supplying academic papers.

Here’s a different angle on the theme of academic nationalism.

A reader sent me this story from CNN about a New Jersey teenager who has been accepted at all eight Ivy League universities.

Ifeoma White-Thorpe said she was shaking when she got the eighth acceptance letter.

“I was like, oh my gosh, oh my gosh, like this might be eight out of eight and I clicked it and it said ‘Congratulations’ and I was like oh my goodness!” White-Thorpe told CNN affiliate WABC-TV.

White-Thorpe, a senior and student government president at Morris Hills High School in Rockaway, has to choose between Harvard, Yale, Cornell, Columbia, the University of Pennsylvania, Princeton, Dartmouth and Brown.

She wants to study biology and pursue a career in global health.

This doesn’t happen often, the CNN story tells us.

Students getting into all of the Ivies is a monumental feat, but it’s happened to a handful of teens over the past couple of years — Kwasi Enin in 2014, Harold Ekeh in 2015 and Augusta Uwamanzu-Nna and Kelly Hyles last year.

These are all black kids who excel in science subjects. As desperate as universities are to admit black students, they are double desperate to admit blacks pursuing STEM subjects.

I don’t think it is any very cynical asperity on my part to assume that this fully explains the fact of all five named students being black, a thing that would otherwise be wildly improbable. (With only one American resident in eight black, the chance of five picked at random all being black is one in 32,768, about 0.003 percent.)

Note further that none of the five has American slave ancestry. All are first- or second-generation immigrants: four from West Africa, one from Guyana.

I’m not going to feign indignation on behalf of black Americans, who in my opinion get far too many breaks, favors and preferences: http://www.vdare.com/posts/academic-nationalism-for-black-americans


Ramzpaul is basically right in his quarrel with the “1488” wing of White Nationalism. He’s obviously frustrated with purity signaling spirals and LARPing. I believe he’s wrong to accuse 1488ers of being enemy plants, although some of them probably are. I think, however, that his deepest frustration stems from the sense that White Nationalist ideas have the potential to sweep through our society and redefine the political mainstream, were it not for the ease with which our enemies stigmatize them as “Nazi.” (I will use “Nazi” rather than “National Socialist,” because we are talking about stigmatizing rhetoric here.)

Are you worried that our race is in demographic decline? Only Nazis would worry about that! Do you want to secure our borders against criminals and terrorists? Only Nazis would want to do that! Do you think it is crazy that Sweden, Germany, and other European countries have imported thousands of rapists from Africa and the Middle East? Only a Nazi would care about that! Do you think that your country should prefer citizens to foreigners, workers to parasites, decent people to criminals? Only Nazis would think that way! Do you think that whites should start saying “no” to unjust and crazy non-white demands, such as Black Lives Matter protesters who basically demand an end to enforcing laws against black criminals? Only a Nazi would do that. You don’t want to be a Nazi, do you? Then stop protesting against policies that will destroy white people. After all, the only way for white people to atone for the crimes of Nazis is by ceasing to exist.

This kind of rhetoric is so asinine, and the aims it advances are so evil, that it should be child’s play to demolish it. But we have had more than 90 years of anti-Nazi propaganda dinned into us by now, which has created a powerful moral inhibition to think rationally about any policies, no matter how sensible, if they are stigmatized as “just like the Nazis.”

To make matters worse, there are plenty of our own people who happily collaborate in this process of stigmatizing and marginalizing sensible policies as “Nazi.” They jump up and say, “You’re damned right! Only Nazis believe in borders. Only Nazis oppose rape. Only Nazis take their own side in a fight.”

Given a choice between defending policies that are necessary for the survival of our very race — or defending the honor of Adolf Hitler and National Socialism, the 1488 crowd prefers the latter. But this is a perverse and self-defeating move.

Earlier this year, after the mass sexual assaults and harassment of German women by Muslim men on New Year’s Eve, the Mayor of Cologne declared that she was setting up “safe zones” for women at Carnival time. I tweeted the following:

Why can’t all of Germany be a safe zone for women?

It is good propaganda, because the natural answer is “Yes, why not?” We will win when the public’s first reaction to all nationalist policies is “Yes, why not?” Because if every individual should have a room of his own, and every family a house of its own, why shouldn’t every people have a country of its own? Why not?

But imagine a slightly different message:

Hitler was right. Why can’t all of Germany be a safe zone for women?

The initial reaction of most people would be indignation, disbelief, or puzzlement about the first sentence. And very few would go on to read the second sentence at all, much less think, “Yes, why not?” Beyond that, the fact that an opponent of mass rape links his position to Hitler actually lends credibility to the idiotic claim that opposing the rape of German women is somehow a bad thing because it is “just like Hitler.”

The case for racial and ethnic nationalism has never been stronger. Philosophy, science, history, and the news of the day all argue in its favor. Thus it is easy to see why the enemies of nationalism want to marginalize and stigmatize it by linking it to a single central European nationalist movement from the first half of the 20th century. Our enemies claim that Nazism is the only real and authentic form of racial or ethnic nationalism. It is harder to understand why friends of nationalism want to do the same thing.

Nazism is not the only real and authentic form of racial nationalism. It is not the only path to racial nationalist policies. Our politics is based on reason and reality, not on the historical contingencies of central Europe between the wars.

Why is it the case that even in countries like Poland, Ukraine, and Russia, which suffered terribly at the hands of the Nazis, there are nationalists who identify with National Socialism? I think this is a natural product of anti-Nationalist propaganda. When a population accepts the false equivalency nationalism = Nazism, most people will be deterred from nationalism, but there will always be a small minority who will still embrace it.

Some of these people are attracted to Nazism because they really believe it is evil. Not much can be done with such people. Others think it is true and good, and they will embrace what is true and good regardless of any stigmas. These people are admirable. Such sincere idealists might even believe that they can persuade enough of their fellow citizens to tip the political balance in favor of nationalism. After all, history is made by energetic minorities.

There are two problems with this notion:

The number of people receptive to Nazism — paleo or neo — is probably too small to change the direction of any society. (And yes, one’s movement might grow exponentially until it hits its absolute upper limit of, say, .02% of the general populace.)

Generic racial/ethnic nationalist policies have the potential to convert the vast majority of our people, which is why — again — our enemies seek to heap the odium of “Nazism” on them. We have an uphill battle on our hands, and — again — our own people should not make it harder.

So given a choice between option #1 and option #2, the best path to the salvation of our race is clearly #2. Yes, our enemies will always throw the “Nazi” charge our way. But we always have a choice when they do: to help them or to fight them.

Is this “mainstreaming”? No, I am a vanguardist. Mainstreamers want us to change our principles. They want us to be more like the mainstream. I want to keep our principles and change the mainstream to be more like us. I don’t want White Nationalism to go mainstream, I want the mainstream to go White Nationalist. I want to change the public mind, not mirror or echo it.

For me, there are four non-negotiable principles of White Nationalism: (1) Europeans are a distinct race, the white race; (2) our race is on the road to biological extinction because of bad political policies (white genocide); (3) the only solution is to this danger is to create racially and ethnically homogeneous white homelands; and (4) Jews are a distinct people that belong in their own homeland, not scattered about white homelands. We’ll never save our people by abandoning any of these principles, so we will just have to convert them to our way of thinking.

The opposite of the mainstream is the vanguard. But another opposite of the mainstream is the marginal. Vanguardism and marginality are not the same things, though. So we should never mistake self-marginalization for a winning vanguard strategy. Just because something is not mainstream does not mean that it is a vanguard capable of pulling the mainstream behind it.

“Hitler did nothing wrong” is funny as a meme, but it is not defensible as a thesis. And let’s be honest: it is funny because of its chutzpah. There is something bracing about sheer self-assertion in the face of practically the whole world. I was delighted when Charles Manson declared, “The war’s not over as far as I’m concerned.” (Remember, he’s not locked in there with them; they’re locked in there with him.) But the war really is over, although the struggle for European survival goes on. Yes, people build strength by carrying unnecessary burdens. But this is politics, not therapy. And political movements defeat themselves by taking on such burdens.

I once told a friend that I would gladly join his little spiritual honor guard at the crypt of National Socialism, except that I believe that we can actually win. There are a lot of self-defeating attitudes and behaviors on the Alternative Right: alcoholism, drug abuse, LARPing, bickering, internet drama, etc. I believe that people gravitate towards them because, deep down inside, they’re already defeated. They don’t believe we can win; that attitude leads to self-defeating behaviors; and thus their prophecy fulfills itself. Naturally, I would much prefer that they fulfill my prophecy instead: that the Millennials will someday be known as the Greatest Generation, because they will liberate our race and establish homelands for all our peoples.

So, to sum up, I think that Ramzpaul is basically right. But why do I think that it does not matter? Because the 1488ers will never go away, so I think he is wasting his time baiting them. Instead, we need to find a way of accepting their existence and making them into assets rather than liabilities. First, they do attract highly principled and idealistic people, some of whom we can educate. Second, the best way to convert people within our broader camp is not to attack them but to set an example by doing a better job of attacking our common enemies. Third, they make us seem more moderate and centrist by comparison. Thus they can serve as stalking horses, which might scare people into being more accommodating to our approach. Fourth and finally, as Jonathan Bowden often pointed out, the ultra fringes of any political movement generally attract highly energetic and creative people. We can draw upon some of that energy and steal their best memes: https://www.counter-currents.com/2016/04/why-ramzpaul-is-right/


A resource site for common sense right-minded news and information: